On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 3:15 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
This is why I do not trust Rossi's evaluations of his own work. I only
trust independent verification. Fortunately, there have been some good
independent verification test, by Ampenergo, Elforsk, and others.
According
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
In my mind, this makes any Ampenergo test essentially an internal test,
and not an independent one. Ampenergo gives the appearance of being
another one of the many corporations that Rossi has started up for reasons
known only to him.
Rossi did not
Lewan's book describes several tests conducted by Rossi which ended in
failure, and some that ended in fiascos. An example was the test for
Hydrofusion:
The instruments Rossi was using to measure how much electrical energy was
consumed to heat the device showed lower values than the instruments
Boyne portrays them well. Like the guy who claimed he had a flying machine
in his briefcase. They remind me of Certain Unnamed People in this field.
Say it Jed, you are referring to Defkalion, aren't you? This is nothing
that you haven't said before.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jed
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Lewan's book describes several tests conducted by Rossi which ended in
failure, and some that ended in fiascos. An example was the test for
Hydrofusion:
The instruments Rossi was using to measure how much electrical
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Boyne portrays them well. Like the guy who claimed he had a flying machine
in his briefcase. They remind me of Certain Unnamed People in this field.
Say it Jed, you are referring to Defkalion, aren't you? This is nothing
that you haven't said before.
I am
I'm not longer think Rosi is a fraud. But there are still possibility
for serious mistakes.
If he have his instruments wrong calibrated as
in the Uppsala test there may be no
exes energy at all or at least not
much of it.
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 15:15:46 -0400, Axil Axil wrote:
Boyne
torulf.gr...@bredband.net wrote:
If he have his instruments wrong calibrated as in the Uppsala test there
may be no
exes energy at all or at least not much of it.
The Uppsala test failed because the glue was not set. Rossi agreed that it
failed. The test I quoted from above was performed on
How about wrong kinds of instruments, how much of Rosis results are
mad with tis error?
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:53:19 -0400, Jed Rothwell
wrote:
wrote:
If he have his instruments wrong calibrated as in
the Uppsala test there may be no
exes energy at all or at least not
much of it.
torulf.gr...@bredband.net wrote:
How about wrong kinds of instruments . . .
Exactly right.
, how much of Rosis results are made with this error?
Who knows? I cannot judge. He often uses the wrong instruments, or he does
not prepare the instruments correctly. For example, as Lewan described,
I wrote:
It seems to me it is far more likely he is what he appears to be: a
brilliant but headstrong inventor who often does sloppy work. He often cuts
corners because he assumes he is right. He has no regard for conventional
scientific standards.
My office is out here at the PDK airport.
Hello Jed,
I agree with all you have said in this thread. Just think your solution is
too simple when it comes to old bold pilots.
We need the daredevil pilots also. In my opinion that does not make AR a
bad guy. I'd rather call him a risk-taker.
If the Wright brothers and others later had not
12 matches
Mail list logo
