Jones Beene wrote:
> It must have been lost in cyberspace for a day.
>
>
>
> In any event, you have not come up with an effective response – one that
> does not involve something Rossi ‘said’ …
>
Actually, it involves:
1. What Rossi said.
2. What Levi et al. observed on the outside of the cel
Apparently you failed to notice the date of that post. Yesterday.
It must have been lost in cyberspace for a day.
In any event, you have not come up with an effective response - one that
does not involve something Rossi 'said' . since essentially that makes it
irrelevant for the obvious rea
From: Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote:
Their statement is either senile or idiotic, take your pick. Copper
migration is well known, and no lucid physicist misses this point. Kullander
misses it. Is he senile or stupid?
> JR: I do not think that this much copper can migrate through stainless
Jones Beene wrote:
> > JR: I do not think that this much copper can migrate through stainless
> steel, so I doubt that can explain the presence of the copper.
>
>
You did read the patent application, no?
>
> Direct quote from Publication number: US 2011/0005506 A1 Filing date: Aug
> 4,
> 2009 "A
From: Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote:
Their statement is either senile or idiotic, take your pick. Copper
migration is well known, and no lucid physicist misses this point. Kullander
misses it. Is he senile or stupid?
> JR: I do not think that this much copper can migrate through stainless
stee
Jones Beene wrote:
Their statement is either senile or idiotic, take your pick. Copper
migration is well known, and no lucid physicist misses this point.
Kullander misses it. Is he senile or stupid?
I do not think that this much copper can migrate through stainless
steel, so I doubt that c
From: Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote:
I find it closer to delusional than conclusive. These two Swedes are acting
more like cheer-leaders than top scientists. Kullander is 'emeritus' and
could be approaching senility . . .
> JR: In my opinion, such ad hominem comments are inappropriate fo
You do not say anything about the numbers. Insulting the people
without talking about the numbers is worthless, and makes you look
like a troll and an imbecile. Is there something wrong with the
numbers they mentioned? Can you show math saying it IS possible to do
with chemical energy?
Alexande
Jones Beene wrote:
I find it closer to delusional than conclusive. These two Swedes are
acting more like cheer-leaders than top scientists. Kullander is
'emeritus' and could be approaching senility . . .
In my opinion, such ad hominem comments are inappropriate for this
forum. There is no
From: Jed Rothwell
Mattia Rizzi wrote:
>Cold fusion has been replicated thousands of times in hundreds of labs, and
***conclusively verified*** by people such as Levi and Kullander.
You are too enthusiastic.
Even Hanno Essén said (on Italian's Skeptics Society (CICAP) magazine
(Quer
10 matches
Mail list logo
