Robert Leguillon wrote:
Where did they increase? They never went up in the E-Cat, only remained pretty
darned steady (pegged to boiling point, slowly decreasing).
The temperature in the eCat cannot go up because it is boiling water at
a little more than 1 atm. It can boil away the water faste
veeder...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 8:17 AM
>To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>Subject: Re: [Vo]:Please stop making unsupported, physically impossible
>assertions about stored heat
>
>Pour some boiling water into a thermos. For how long does the water
>continue to boil
Hi Jed,
I can design a device where heat in the output goes up after power is turned
off.
A simple analogy would be a steel bar, if apply heat to one end with a torch
and measure the temperature of the other end there will be a temperature
difference along the bar. When I stop applying heat there
: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Please stop making unsupported, physically impossible
assertions about stored heat
Pour some boiling water into a thermos. For how long does the water
continue to boil?
Harry
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Robert Leguillon
wrote:
> Jed,
> Don't
Hello Robert Leguillon,
a pretty good short summary of Horace Heffner's competent, detailed,
much improved critical reviews -- so pragmatic skepticism seems amply
justified...
Thanks, Rich Murray
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Robert Leguillon
wrote:
> Jed,
> Don't miss the fundamental arg
How much power does this frequency device need?
Harry
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Robert Leguillon
wrote:
> Do I get a "device that generates frequencies"?
>
>> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:16:48 -0400
>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Please stop making unsupported, physica
Do I get a "device that generates frequencies"?
> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:16:48 -0400
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Please stop making unsupported, physically impossible
> assertions about stored heat
> From: hveeder...@gmail.com
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
>
> Pour so
Pour some boiling water into a thermos. For how long does the water
continue to boil?
Harry
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Robert Leguillon
wrote:
> Jed,
> Don't miss the fundamental argument of heat storage.
> Great care was taken to insulate the E-Cat, and keep heat from escaping. If
> you
Robert Leguillon wrote:
Don't miss the fundamental argument of heat storage.
Great care was taken to insulate the E-Cat, and keep heat from
escaping. If you think that this is impossible, I have an experiment
for you. Make a scalding hot 1/2 cup of coffee. Put it into a
Thermos. See how lo
Alexander Hollins wrote:
jed, if the power were used to, say, run a thermoelectric heat pump,
cooling one side of the pump, and heating something that was otherwise
internally insulated . . .
Sure. I agree. That would not be passive cooling. However, people have
looked inside Rossi devices an
t the secondary MUST BE incorrect. If the measurements are
correct, the E-Cat would run dry and the temperature would have to rise.
> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 07:40:21 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Please stop making unsupported, physically impossible
> assertions about stored heat
> F
>From Hollins:
> jed, if the power were used to, say, run a thermoelectric heat pump,
> cooling one side of the pump, and heating something that was
> otherwise internally insulated, then heat WOULD go up after power
> is removed. (Just saying, if I were going to fake something, that's
> what I'd
jed, if the power were used to, say, run a thermoelectric heat pump,
cooling one side of the pump, and heating something that was otherwise
internally insulated, then heat WOULD go up after power is removed.
(Just saying, if I were going to fake something, that's what I'd do. )
On Tue, Oct 11, 2
Colin Hercus wrote:
If this excess energy over what is required to heat .9g/s of water to
124C is somehow stored in the eCAT (say, as thermal energy in a fairly
well insulated block of steel) then it would be enough energy to
possibly give the impression of a self sustaining reaction for at
l
14 matches
Mail list logo
