as a constituent of a coherent system.
Bob Cook
frm: Brian Ahern<mailto:ahern_br...@msn.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 7, 2018 4:21 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter
andexplains the EM driv
il.com>]
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 10:41 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter
andexplains the EM drive
Jones—
I had the same idea about DH and QI together answering the galactic rotat
ion It is widely used today.
>
>
> --
> *From:* Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2018 6:05 AM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark
> matter andexplains the EM drive
.
From: Russ <russ.geo...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2018 6:05 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter
andexplains the EM drive
McCulloch’s QI concept readily conforms to observed real cold fusion data and
is far su
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter
andexplains the EM drive
Jones—
I had the same idea about DH and QI together answering the galactic rotation
problem. The Mills spectrum of DH surely warrants a comparative review
IMHO.
Bob Cook
From: JonesBeene<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>
Sent: Monday, February 5, 2018 10:14 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantized inertia Ted talk removes need for dark matter
andexplains the EM drive
There is a new study from NASA on
There is a new study from NASA on dark matter/ dark energy and the
reinterpretation of the Chandra findings WRT the mystery radiation signature at
3.5 keV.
https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/chandra/news/a-new-twist-in-the-dark-matter-tale.html
CERN has a new report on DM as well. The
7 matches
Mail list logo
