[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Scientific fraud, sloppy science – yes, they happen

2013-05-07 Thread James Bowery
That won't work. The problem is at your end, Jed. On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > TEST > > The title of this discussion seems to have the conniptions. > > If anyone would like to comment on this again I suggest you create a new > thread with a different title > > - Jed >

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Scientific fraud, sloppy science – yes, they happen

2013-05-07 Thread James Bowery
After his treatment by the AIP, who can blame Bishop for being "conflicted" about cold fusion both because we're all "conflicted" about it because virtually none of us are the "true believers" the shit-for-brains pseudoskeptics make us out to be, and because there is tremendous value demanding inve

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Scientific fraud, sloppy science – yes, they happen

2013-05-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
TEST The title of this discussion seems to have the conniptions. If anyone would like to comment on this again I suggest you create a new thread with a different title - Jed

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Scientific fraud, sloppy science – yes, they happen

2013-05-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
James Bowery wrote: > Although they were not able to have his award rescinded, they were able to > get the AIP, in their award statement, basically censure Mr. Bishop even as > they awarded him. > Bishop himself seemed conflicted about cold fusion. He did not want to hear anything more about it,