On Jul 17, 2007, at 4:18 PM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Now you're pulling my liver ;-)
Oh how dreadful! Please excuse me! 8^)
The risks you mention are real, let's just hope they stand by their
"Don't be evil" corporate motto! In any case I don't use gmail for
confidential emails.
I have
bla bla, third hit in the list".
Michel
- Original Message -
From: "Horace Heffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Isomers, LENR, reprocessed D2O
>
> On Jul 17, 2007, at 5:12 AM, Michel Jullian wro
On Jul 17, 2007, at 5:12 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
I think you are pulling my leg (I wonder where this silly
expression comes from BTW), but if you really know of such a
"feature" in Google any pointers would be welcome.
Michel
Say, I just realized from your "gmail" address you have sign
On Jul 17, 2007, at 5:22 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
--- "R.C.Macaulay" wrote:
Wonder if anyone has considered the dimensional
(fractal) angle?
Getting a little over into never never land with
the
fractal although I can imagine the results of light
dispersing through a prism ...
Richard,
I
Jones wrote..
If you have watched a visual and animated
fractal progression, from what seems to be zooming in
from larger to smaller, you can get some appreciation
for this situation. There is never a full dimensional
change (or power law jump)
However, as a practical matter there is little to
d
Jones Beene wrote:
Horace Heffner wrote:
IF - when all is said and done - (big IF) it then becomes apparent
that a high ratio of 18O to 16O is in fact the most
Interesting observation.
I think that when identifing isotopes such as O 18 or O16 a better
convention might be O (18) or O (16).
Horace Heffner wrote:
A gravimagnetically bound mirror nucleus would make the spin radius of a
normal nucleus look unusually large.
Well getting back to D2O and the possibility that ...
IF - when all is said and done - (big IF) it then becomes apparent that
a high ratio of 18O to 16O is i
--- Michel Jullian wrote:
> I think you are pulling my leg (I wonder where this
> silly expression comes from BTW), but if you really
> know of such a "feature" in Google any pointers
> would be welcome.
Hmmm ... I assumed Horace was correct, because I do in
fact have a Google alert for 18-oxyg
day, July 17, 2007 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Isomers, LENR, reprocessed D2O
>
> On Jul 17, 2007, at 2:48 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
>
>> Horace this was mean, I almost believed you in spite of your wink
>> so I ran the query myself, fortunately "big broother&quo
--- "R.C.Macaulay" wrote:
>> Wonder if anyone has considered the dimensional
(fractal) angle?
> Getting a little over into never never land with
the
fractal although I can imagine the results of light
dispersing through a prism ...
Richard,
I should have made that clearer, although your men
On Jul 17, 2007, at 2:48 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Horace this was mean, I almost believed you in spite of your wink
so I ran the query myself, fortunately "big broother" ranked the
same page top :)
The Vortex list archive always gets high ranking in Google queries
for some reason.
You
Jones wrote...
...but it would be nice to reconcile mirror matter and
anti-matter elegantly, assuming that the two are not
mutually exclusive... Apparently Robert Forward did
not do this. It would also be nice to reconcile the
Dirac epo field with mirror matter. Wonder if anyone
has considered
On Jul 16, 2007, at 5:55 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
--- Horace Heffner writes:
Here is a way out there improbable thought for you.
One CF joker may be mirror matter.
For those who haven't seen it, Wiki has a pretty good
entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_matter
...but it would be ni
;Horace Heffner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2007 2:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Isomers, LENR, reprocessed D2O
>
> On Jul 16, 2007, at 12:27 PM, OrionWorks wrote:
>
>> From Jones:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> BTW - is it odd that the
--- Horace Heffner writes:
> Here is a way out there improbable thought for you.
One CF joker may be mirror matter.
For those who haven't seen it, Wiki has a pretty good
entry:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mirror_matter
...but it would be nice to reconcile mirror matter and
anti-matter eleg
Here is a way out there improbable thought for you. One CF joker may
be mirror matter. Mirror matter is invisible and moves fairly
readily through normal matter (when not bound to it at a nuclear
level), but has been theorized (by Robert Foot, *Shadowlands*) to
have some degree of linkage
On Jul 16, 2007, at 12:27 PM, OrionWorks wrote:
From Jones:
...
BTW - is it odd that the previous message to Vo - part of
it included below, is the first thing that turns up on a
google search for [18-O "shape isomer"] even though it is
only a few days old. Don't they rank these things by h
From Jones:
...
BTW - is it odd that the previous message to Vo - part of
it included below, is the first thing that turns up on a
google search for [18-O "shape isomer"] even though it is
only a few days old. Don't they rank these things by how
often they are read?
"Your actions have been
In a followup attempt to track down more specific information on the
subject of D2O "variability" in LENR:
Mitchell Swartz has indicated that he has seen inexplicable variation,
batch-to-batch, in D2O under otherwise identical conditions.
He has also replicated the Laser enhancement effect
19 matches
Mail list logo
