Re: [Vo]:Re: V'Ger must evolve

2008-04-17 Thread Harry Veeder
On 17/4/2008 6:01 PM, Michel Jullian wrote: > I agree 100%, what would seem anomalous to me would be no "anomalies" in the > trajectories. > > Michel sorry? > - Original Message - > From: "Robin van Spaandonk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 12:01 AM > Subje

Re: [Vo]:Re: V'Ger must evolve

2008-04-17 Thread Nick Palmer
Don't shoot this down - I'm only dreaming! They also noted anomalies in five other satellites apart from one which passed by planets "symmetrically" (i.e orbital axis not inclined). They speculated that the rotation of the planet might have something to do with it and I thought I may as well bri

[Vo]:Re: V'Ger must evolve

2008-04-17 Thread Michel Jullian
I agree 100%, what would seem anomalous to me would be no "anomalies" in the trajectories. Michel - Original Message - From: "Robin van Spaandonk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 12:01 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:V'Ger must evolve In reply to Harry Veeder's message of