That won't work.
The problem is at your end, Jed.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> TEST
>
> The title of this discussion seems to have the conniptions.
>
> If anyone would like to comment on this again I suggest you create a new
> thread with a different title
>
> - Jed
>
After his treatment by the AIP, who can blame Bishop for being "conflicted"
about cold fusion both because we're all "conflicted" about it because
virtually none of us are the "true believers" the shit-for-brains
pseudoskeptics make us out to be, and because there is tremendous value
demanding inve
TEST
The title of this discussion seems to have the conniptions.
If anyone would like to comment on this again I suggest you create a new
thread with a different title
- Jed
James Bowery wrote:
> Although they were not able to have his award rescinded, they were able to
> get the AIP, in their award statement, basically censure Mr. Bishop even as
> they awarded him.
>
Bishop himself seemed conflicted about cold fusion. He did not want to hear
anything more about it,
My response:
This article is an excellent example of the confluence of sloppy journalism
with sloppy science. The journalistic investigators of "cold fusion" were
beset by problems similar to those besetting the scientific investigators.
The most prominent and early example was Jerry E. Bishop, wh
This is a shame.
Once a false narrative becomes widespread it is difficult to erase it from
the mass media and the popular imagination. Years ago I hoped that the
Internet would make it easier for people to learn the truth, but that has
not happened much. Mythology and distorted versions of histor
citing cold fusion as usual example.
Scientific fraud, sloppy science – yes, they happen
http://theconversation.com/scientific-fraud-sloppy-science-yes-they-happen-13948
7 matches
Mail list logo
