RE: Genius Inventor by Thomas E Stolper. Highly recommended, available from
Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Genius-Inventor-controversy-historical-contemporary/dp
/1419643045/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1302024882sr=8-1
This book by former vortician Tom Stolper is the detailed history of Randell
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Essentially, back in March 1992 almost twenty years ago – Thermacore put
into operation the prototype Ni-H cell which operated for nearly a year at
greater than 3:1 excess energy (50 watts continuous of excess energy for
about a year, but catch-22 ...
There are two essential conditions necessary for a Ni-H
system to work:
a) proper nanometric structure- i.e active sites NAE at high density;
b) the surface of Ni should absolutely free of adsorbed gases that could
compete with hydrogen for the active sites
Piantelii has discovered this and has
Interesting speculation, Jones.
I never read Stolper's book. Nevertheless, I remember his scrappy
posts from the old Yahoo Hydrino group, particularly as he incessantly
went after Zimmerman.
Does Stolper's book reveal any kind of useful detail as to what kind
of additional catalysts might have
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:So close, so far away
Interesting speculation, Jones.
I never read Stolper's book. Nevertheless, I remember his scrappy
posts from the old Yahoo Hydrino group, particularly as he incessantly
went after Zimmerman.
Does Stolper's book reveal any kind of useful
and Mill's
fine Ni wire?
Dennis
--
From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2011 1:34 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:So close, so far away
Interesting speculation, Jones.
I never
the rate by at least an order of magnitude.
There are other choices.
Curiously, potassium is not deemed to be good for spillover, but sodium is.
-Original Message-
From: OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Subject: Re: [Vo]:So close, so far away
Interesting speculation, Jones.
I never read
Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
There are zero data re Rossi's nanopowder, but if it is nano, the specific
surface is much greater as that of the wire.
Nano or cornsilk, as far as I know any powder has far more surface area than
wire.
The definition of nanopowder, by the way, is
Surface area: When you go down in size, every time you reduce the radius by
half (for a sphere) you increase the available surface area by ~50 times for
the same weight.
The problem with this rule of thumb is that true nanopowder is expensive,
yet there are a few kinds of useful nickel having
I wonder if the Patterson beads were too perfect when replicated?
Maybe the working batch used a sloppy substrate.
T
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Surface area: When you go down in size, every time you reduce the radius by
half (for a sphere) you increase the available surface area by ~50 times for
the same weight.
But, a non-spherical particle would have greater
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:51:15 +0300:
Hi,
[snip]
There are zero data re Rossi's nanopowder, but if it is nano, the specific
surface is much greater as that of the wire.
...from the photo provided, it would appear that the granules have a diameter on
the order of 10
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:56 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
(Does someone have a reference for the photo? I can't remember exactly which
report it was in.)
The image is in their patent app:
than the grain itself.
Regards
Fran
Re: [Vo]:So close, so far away
Dennis
Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:43:22 -0700
Is anyone out there good at running numbers?
what is the comparison in surface area of Rossi's nanopowder and Mill's fine
Ni wire?
Dennis
Nickel (2- 10 mnm) can be accomplished by much larger grains of
powder because it is the formation of “pore like” geometry between the
grains which is far smaller than the grain itself.
Regards
Fran
*Re: [Vo]:So close, so far away***
*Dennis*
Tue, 05 Apr 2011 12:43:22 -0700
Is anyone
15 matches
Mail list logo
