Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

On 30 Oct 2011, at 23:44, Man on Bridges wrote: > However the title Professor is to my knowledge not a protected title, so > anyone could use it. Here in the UK at least, professor is a job title not a qualification. Joe

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

Man on Bridges wrote: > However the title Professor is to my knowledge not a protected title, so > anyone could use it. > Here in Atlanta, anyone can call himself a Bishop. See Bishop Eddie Long. - Jed

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

Hi, On 30-10-2011 22:34, Jed Rothwell wrote: Michele Comitini > wrote: But are called "Ingegnere" even if the correct term would be "Dottore in Ingegneria" so reading Ing. in front of a name does not imply being registered to the "Ordine degli

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

Michele Comitini wrote: > But are called "Ingegnere" even if the correct term would be "Dottore > in Ingegneria" so reading Ing. in front of a name does not imply being > registered > to the "Ordine degli Ingegneri" unless the document is a public contract. > I think what you are saying is that

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

Jed, sorry I deleted a piece of the first sentence... I wrote: "I am among those that don't have a clear writing as yours..." mic 2011/10/30 Michele Comitini : > Jed, > > I am among. I simply meant to say that Fioravanti can have a legal > degree in engineering, but he does not need to > be reg

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

Jed, I am among. I simply meant to say that Fioravanti can have a legal degree in engineering, but he does not need to be registered among the "Ordine degli Ingegneri" to make a report for his employer. On the other hand if he is a "consultant" then it is very likely that he will (or has by now)

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

Does anyone have an idea how long time and on what power level input electricity was supplied into device? Rossi said in the raport: http://www.nyteknik.se/incoming/article3303693.ece/BINARY/Report+Ecat+Oct28+%28pdf%29 that input power was zero between 12:30 and 18:00. Does this means that input

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

Terry Blanton wrote: I'm sure that registration requirements are quite different in other > countries since there is such a variance between states here. > To summarize, even if we find no trace of Fioravanti on line, he may well be a P.E. If we can track him down, that proves it is a legit tes

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

Registration requirements are governed by the state in the US. Generally, if you are registered in one state, you can obtain comity in another by application with that state. Georgia also offers comity with other countries. I work for Atkins North America, a division of the UK firm ( atkinsglobal

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

Jouni Valkonen wrote: > Jed, I meant with calibration, that there was not measured the amount of > steam. Amount of steam correlates with temperature, but this correlation was > not established. Therefore we do not have any means to know, how much steam > is 104.5°C. However I take back that I t

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

Jed, I meant with calibration, that there was not measured the amount of steam. Amount of steam correlates with temperature, but this correlation was not established. Therefore we do not have any means to know, how much steam is 104.5°C. However I take back that I took back my words. I was conside

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

Jouni Valkonen wrote: > However, this test was by no means made by independed scientists. > Well, supposedly it was. Rossi claims that was an independent engineer. We have only his word for that. > I take some words back. Rossi's calorimetry was not calibrated. Therefore > we do not have any

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

-Original Message- > From: Jouni Valkonen > To: vortex-l > Sent: Sat, Oct 29, 2011 4:29 am > Subject: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph > > Here is the temperature graphs with more accurate time stamps: > http://dl.dropbox.com/u/28230378/oct28

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

: Jouni Valkonen To: vortex-l Sent: Sat, Oct 29, 2011 4:29 am Subject: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph Here is the temperature graphs with more accurate time stamps: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/28230378/oct28demo.png And some simple calculations: Water flow rate: 675.6 l

Re: [Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

I take some words back. Rossi's calorimetry was not calibrated. Therefore we do not have any proper evidence for the performance. I guess that there was some excess heat, but nothing more accurate can be said. Right now we need to wait for the miracle that the mystery company steps forward or the

[Vo]:Some calculations, discussion and accurate temperature graph

Here is the temperature graphs with more accurate time stamps: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/28230378/oct28demo.png And some simple calculations: Water flow rate: 675.6 l/h Temperature above 100°C: 12:34 End of dataset: 18:24 Total time: 350 min (5h 50 min) Heating period: Started: 11:00 / Ended: