Hi,
On 16-9-2011 14:55, Daniel Rocha wrote:
And working with old computers would never be easier than new ones.
They actually require much more sophisticated knowledge of computing
to operate them than nowadays. The more "hi-tech" something is, the
dumber it is.
Hear, hear, someone who speak
Susan, I know that it is written by a fan, I checked that right after
Jouni's answer and figured out by myself. BTW, while written Italian is a
bit weird and I don't understand much of it, but given the way Rossi,
Focardi and Levi speak, I can understand most of it. For example, while
Rossi said th
Daniel, most likely Focardi don't even know about this Facebook page.
I've heard that, as an old style school professor, is not very confortable
with internet and stuff. When he needs to use emails he needs often
someone's help. He still calls his desktop "elaboratore" (calculator).
I believe that
I was checking. It's true, that's a fan page. But only Rossi's emotional
state is enough to conclude that either that test is true of everything is a
fake.
On 2011-09-16 01:54, Daniel Rocha wrote:
Focardi answers questions there.
Do you mean this Facebook page?
http://it-it.facebook.com/pages/Prof-Sergio-Focardi/116761995001742
Informazioni "QUESTA PAGINA E' UN OMAGGIO NON UFFICIALE DI AMMIRATORI
DEL PROFESSORE. [...]"
Translation: "this page
Focardi answers questions there.
On 2011-09-16 01:48, Daniel Rocha wrote:
That is not a joke, if you follow Focardi's page on facebook, you will
see that he was very angry with that. Also from Levi's comments as far
as I remember.
If that test was a farce, everything is a farce.
As far as I know the Focardi facebook page is s
That is not a joke, if you follow Focardi's page on facebook, you will see
that he was very angry with that. Also from Levi's comments as far as I
remember.
If that test was a farce, everything is a farce.
That might be very odd, and I cannot answer that. However what else it
could be than a joke? Rossi demonstrated E-Cat 5 times so that we have
some objective data available before June demonstration. And all of
them they worked exactly as Rossi claimed. As we remember Rossi always
claimed more than
He spent weeks calling snakes and making paranoid posts. He said he wouldn't
make any more tests until October. He just calmed down 2 or 3 weeks ago and
even allowed that new Lewan's test.
I thought you and Jed conceded that 3000KW of output could be a reasonable
quantity from the looks of the ste
2011/9/16 Daniel Rocha :
> If that was a practical joke, why was Rossi so angry?
Good question, Daniel. I have some guesses but your guess is as good
as mine. But is he really angry?
–Jouni
If that was a practical joke, why was Rossi so angry?
DeltaOhm instrument is quite sophisticated and it suits very well for
measuring steam quality and thus enthalpy that steam caries. There is
no problem with that, because as Wikipaedia quite clearly defines
steam quality that "Low quality steam would contain a high moisture
percentage and therefore
13 matches
Mail list logo
