Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:58:32 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
This must be what everyone is talking about. The description of the
power plant is rather nebulous. The section gets off on the wrong
foot with this stateme
Nebulous, I like
thomas malloy wrote:
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:58:32 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
This must be what everyone is talking about. The description of the
power plant is rather nebulous. The section gets off on the wrong
foot with this
This must be what everyone is talking about. The description of the
power plant is rather nebulous. The section gets off on the wrong
foot with this statement:
Atomic hydrogen ordinarily has a stable electronic state that is
much higher in energy than allowed by thermodynamic laws.
Even if
I have not been following events at BlacklightPower. It is unclear to
me which part of the web site, or which paper, reports the progress
being discussed here about solid fuel. The What's New section does
not describe any recent technical progress as far as I can tell. Is
this the new stuff?
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
Atomic hydrogen ordinarily has a stable electronic state that is
much higher in energy than allowed by thermodynamic laws.
Even if you believe that you can violate the laws of thermodynamics,
you shouldn't say so in the first sentence.
Actually, it says that the
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:58:32 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
This must be what everyone is talking about. The description of the
power plant is rather nebulous. The section gets off on the wrong
foot with this statement:
Atomic hydrogen ordinarily has a stable electronic
6 matches
Mail list logo
