To prove the concept I think you do not have to give money you can
> privately show interest in giving money to support Rossi's endeavors.
>
I think it would be difficult -- Rossi will be suspicious if he doesn't
know you or has not heard of you. Jed noted that several scheduled demos
including t
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 5:29 AM, Michele Comitini <
michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Much simpler to read Krivit's latest comment on his latest post. It seems
> > pretty clear Rossi's after someone's money. Anyway, I don't have the
> capital
> > to do the experiment you propose, even if
>
> Much simpler to read Krivit's latest comment on his latest post. It seems
> pretty clear Rossi's after someone's money. Anyway, I don't have the capital
> to do the experiment you propose, even if I wanted to.
>
Everyone in civilized countries is after someone's money, don't you
get paid for a
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 4:25 AM, Michele Comitini <
michele.comit...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Joshua,
>
> What you say can be proved easily. Just offer some money to Rossi in
> different amounts, at different times and from different identities.
> See what happens, and *then* of course report here...
Joshua,
What you say can be proved easily. Just offer some money to Rossi in
different amounts, at different times and from different identities.
See what happens, and *then* of course report here...
mic
2011/11/15 Joshua Cude :
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Charles Hope
> wrote:
>>
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Charles Hope
wrote:
>
>
> He's shifty and does not inspire confidence.
>
Oh, but he does. Several people have written to him offering him money.
That clearly indicates he has their confidence. And even among those who
don't publicly offer money, the obvious Rossi-
On Nov 14, 2011, at 14:04, Mary Yugo wrote:
> My working theory on why he behaves that way is that he's scamming.
There are two problems with that.
He's shifty and does not inspire confidence.
He's not taking all the money he's being offered.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
>
> Even if that were true, a 30 L vessel of water cannot remain at boiling
> temperature for 4 hours,
>
Why not? If it's perfectly insulated it can stay at boiling temperature
indefinitely. It all depends on the rate that energy is removed, a
>From Jed:
...
> Many skeptics do not seem to understand this distinction. They look at the
> factors a college instructor would cite in grading an lab exercise:
> neatness, correct use of instruments, documentation, exposition, positioning
> of thermocouples, and other did-you-follow-the-textboo
Mary Yugo wrote:
I suspect he practices misdirection ...
We agree. I think his entire performance at the demos consists mostly
of misdirection.
Even if that were true, a 30 L vessel of water cannot remain at boiling
temperature for 4 hours, so we can be sure the claims are true. Ther
> I suspect he practices misdirection ...
>
We agree. I think his entire performance at the demos consists mostly of
misdirection.
Terry Blanton wrote:
> I don't recall Rothwell saying that Rossi lies.
>
Because I never did say that. I said repeatedly that as far as I know, he
always tells the truth about engineering technical details.
Mind your, the list of his statements we compiled includes some
diametrically opposite
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Mary Yugo wrote:
> And even Jed Rothwell said the guy probably lies
> frequently and elaborately!
>
I don't recall Rothwell saying that Rossi lies.
T
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Axil Axil wrote:
> You seem to believe that Rossi owes you an explanation. He dislikes you
> intenslyas a member of the chattering class and will not be affected by
> your demands for proof.
>
> Rossi will cooperate with his cu stomers up to a point. He will remo
You seem to believe that Rossi owes you an explanation. He dislikes you
intenslyas a member of the chattering class and will not be affected by
your demands for proof.
Rossi will cooperate with his cu stomers up to a point. He will remove the
veil from his invention just enough to get a customer t
Mary Yugo wrote:
Re Mary Yugo, I am reading only what she tells about Rossi and the E-cat,
>> not LENR or CF.
>>
>> Simple and completely correct. Proof of Rossi has nothing to do with
> LENR or CF.
>
Rossi and Defkalion would like you to think so. Rossi's patent attorney, in
the letters publis
>
> Re Mary Yugo, I am reading only what she tells about Rossi and the E-cat,
> not LENR or CF.
>
> Simple and completely correct. Proof of Rossi has nothing to do with LENR
or CF. Thanks, Peter
>
> All of the doubts are from the peanut gallery on the Internet, especially
> people such as Mary Yugo. She says she knows nothing about cold fusion, so
> obviously she cannot judge. Asking her to evaluate this would be like
> asking me to review a performance of the Metropolitan Opera. I do not
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> jmp jmp wrote:
>
> First, the part about "forget Rossi": I think Rossi has been an enormous
>> time/talent sink with no benefit to the LENR field. Arguably, he's set the
>> field back quite a lot.
>>
>
> That is preposterous. He has made
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Asking her to evaluate this would be like asking
> me to review a performance of the Metropolitan Opera. I do not know the
> first thing about music and I have never listened to the Metropolitan Opera.
When the fat lady comes out to sing, y
jmp jmp mailto:crossection...@yahoo.com>> wrote:
First, the part about "forget Rossi": I think Rossi has been an
enormous time/talent sink with no benefit to the LENR field.
Arguably, he's set the field back quite a lot.
That is preposterous. He has made more progress toward practica
I'd like to offer a modest proposal: namely, that we all forget Rossi and focus
on how to move the field of LENR forward, either to a definitive demonstration
that it has potential we should pursue with greater resources, or to a
recognition that there's no "there" there, and that we should look
. . . . . . This isn't aimed at any one person, but to
all who are of the likeminded mentality which I am
finding myself anathema to.
Which one of you built the Georgia Guidestones? Or
maybe some drunk from the Dime Box Saloon built them.
If so, they're excusable as a funny prank.
I don't have an
Jack Smith writes
http://kelsocartography.com/blog/?tag=harpers
...from Harper's, Jan 2009. "Using conservative assumptions, we calculate that
the bill for the Bush-era: the total new debt combined with the total new
accrued obligations amounts to $10.35 trillion..."
If you reduce the US popu
Jed sez:
> Taylor J. Smith wrote:
>
>> Paying interest on this debt as it continues to grow should be repugnant
>> to all of us -- what a waste of our tax dollars.
>
> Why? A government should honor its obligations.
>
> In any case, large amounts of the debt are held by other countries,
> especial
Taylor J. Smith wrote:
Paying interest on this debt as it continues to grow should be
repugnant to all of us -- what a waste of our tax dollars.
Why? A government should honor its obligations.
In any case, large amounts of the debt are held by other countries,
especially China. We cannot leg
http://kelsocartography.com/blog/?tag=harpers
Republished from Harper's, January 2009 issue. By Linda
J. Bilmes and Joseph E. Stiglitz:
``Using conservative assumptions, we calculate that the
bill for {George W.} Bush-era excess, the total new debt
combined with the total new accrued obligations
27 matches
Mail list logo
