Re: [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined

2011-01-12 Thread David Jonsson
enient distant > > markers; there's no reason I can see to think a centrifuge wouldn't work > > even if the universe were nearly empty.) > > > > > >> > >> David > >> > >> David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370 > >&

Re: [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined

2011-01-12 Thread Mauro Lacy
t; even if the universe were nearly empty.) > > >> >> David >> >> David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370 >> >> >> >> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Harry Veeder > <mailto:hlvee...@yahoo.com>> wrote: >> >>

Re: [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined

2011-01-11 Thread Stephen A. Lawrence
e right link? > Harry > > > *From:* David Jonsson <mailto:davidjonssonswe...@gmail.com>> > *To:* vortex-l mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>> > *Sent:* Tue, January 11, 2011 3:47:23 PM > *Subject:* [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneousl

Re: [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined

2011-01-11 Thread David Jonsson
gt; *Sent:* Tue, January 11, 2011 3:47:23 PM > *Subject:* [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined > > Hi > > Ain't I right? > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Standard_gravity#effect_of_centripetal_acceleration > > Sidereal period should be used and not solar.

Re: [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined

2011-01-11 Thread Harry Veeder
Is this the right link? Harry > >From: David Jonsson >To: vortex-l >Sent: Tue, January 11, 2011 3:47:23 PM >Subject: [Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined > >Hi > > >Ain't I right? >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Standard_gravity#effect_of_centripet

[Vo]:g on Wikipedia erroneously defined

2011-01-11 Thread David Jonsson
Hi Ain't I right? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Standard_gravity#effect_of_centripetal_acceleration Sidereal period should be used and not solar. Do you support a change? David David Jonsson, Sweden, ph