Grimer wrote
Now the implication of the magnetic lines of force not being
orthogonal to the current carrying wire is that they form a tightly wind
spiral which starts and finished at a charged particle. In short the charge
particle is acting as a turbine taking in Chi-aether [chi being the
At 07:51 am 11-05-05 -0500, Richard wrote:
Grimer wrote
Now the implication of the magnetic lines of force not
being orthogonal to the current carrying wire is that
they form a tightly wind spiral which starts and finished
at a charged particle. In short the charge particle is
acting
Grimer wrote
If nothing else SMOT has made us think about the possibilities.
I have fellowship with a retired airline pilot that has weather eye. I have
mentioned the " strange" vortices shed from the main vortex created in our glass
test tanks.( while the main vortex is spinning) ,
In
At 02:47 pm 04-05-05 -0400, Grimer wrote:
Public wrote:
Have you seen this?:
http://www.reidarfinsrud.no/sider/mobile/foto.html
Wow. Notice that the magnets are moving at 90d angles from the motion
of the ball in each cycle, in the movie clip. Reminds me of the SMOT.
Of course, if it
... BLP has tantalizing results reported
by _one_
lab and an outlandish theory to explain these results which
nobody else
has ever achieved AFAIK.
I wrote to the team at Penn State, several years ago, who had replicated one
of Mill's excess heat experiments under contract. They replied that
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Of course, if it really is a perpetual motion machine, then this'll be
the biggest thing since Relativity,
It'll be the biggest thing since Principia Mathematica. It's much bigger
than relativity.
PM of the first kind using static magnets goes down to the bedrock of
Jed wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Of course, if it really is a perpetual motion machine, then this'll be
the biggest thing since Relativity,
It'll be the biggest thing since Principia Mathematica. It's much bigger
than relativity.
PM of the first kind using static magnets goes
I wrote:
I classify both cold fusion and the Mills claims as anomalous energy.
Anomalous is not synonymous with unbelievable -- it just means there
is no explanation. Mills, unlike CF, does not have a textbook physics
explanation.
That is contradictory. Obviously I meant that anomalous
Mike Carrell wrote:
But people should at least be cognizant of the fact that they
are making extraordinary claims! And they should expect disbelief, and be
ready to deal with it. They should offer rock solid evidence even if it is
not extraordinary.
Ditto claims by Mills and Correa. As far as
--- Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly right. What is it strange is that many of
the people making these claims, including some well
educated ones, do not seem to realize this.
Hi Jed,
So can I ship you a SMOT and the measurement system so
you can prove the data I'm seeing is not
Jed Rothwell wrote:
[ ... ]
Mills is much, much better and far more credible than people like the
Methernitha crowd, Greg Watson, or for that matter Correa. But he
still has a wide credibility gap, and he still has not made a real
effort to convince people. The last thing he told me, years
--- Public [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you seen this?:
http://www.reidarfinsrud.no/sider/mobile/foto.html
Hi Craig,
Not to be a wet blanket but that big spring in the
central column could be a worry?
Now it's just engineering effort, time and money,
Greg
Find local movie times and
On Tue, 3 May 2005 16:43:39 +1000 (EST), you wrote:
--- Public [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you seen this?:
http://www.reidarfinsrud.no/sider/mobile/foto.html
Hi Craig,
Not to be a wet blanket but that big spring in the
central column could be a worry?
---
In what respect?
--
John Fields
On Mon, 2 May 2005 10:59:26 +1000 (EST), you wrote:
Guys,
Several have asked and many must have wondered what
happened to the SMOT and Greg Watson from 1997 to
2005.
Simply stated I walked away from my research due to
depression which at some time was quite severe. I
turned inward, searching to
Have you seen this?:
http://www.reidarfinsrud.no/sider/mobile/foto.html
Wow. Notice that the magnets are moving at 90d angles from the motion of the
ball in each cycle, in the movie clip. Reminds me of the SMOT.
Of course, if it really is a perpetual motion machine, then this'll be the
biggest
15 matches
Mail list logo
