Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe

2011-09-23 Thread Horace Heffner
On Sep 22, 2011, at 2:06 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Horace Heffner wrote: Some questions for you and other self-appointed experts here: This remark seems to have some emotional content. Darn right it does. I am annoyed. DO you know of any requirement for anyone here on vortex-l to be

Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe

2011-09-23 Thread Jed Rothwell
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote: People who tell it like it is look sophomoric, in my opinion. People who are dismissive run the risk of being themselves dismissed. It is better to leave some room to retreat in case it turns out you are wrong. What is so bad about being wrong.

Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe

2011-09-23 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Jed sez: Here is an interesting treatise on being wrong: http://www.amazon.com/Being-Wrong-Adventures-Margin-Error/dp/0061176044 It seems to be human nature to want to be right about what it is that we chose to pontificate on. Unfortunately, arriving at certain opinions seems to be one of

Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe

2011-09-22 Thread peter . heckert
- Original Nachricht Von: Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 22.09.2011 14:32 Betreff: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe Jed Rothwell wrote: ยป In the first test, Galantini used a Delta Ohm monitor to measure the relative

Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe

2011-09-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: Now what happens, when an inventor without deep knowledge and experience constructs a steam device, makes it unaccessible and then lets unexperienced scientist measure the steam? Most scientists expect that devices that they use are properly constructed and work

Aw: Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe

2011-09-22 Thread peter . heckert
- Original Nachricht Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 22.09.2011 15:53 Betreff: Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: Now what happens, when an inventor without deep knowledge

Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe

2011-09-22 Thread Horace Heffner
On Sep 22, 2011, at 5:53 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: Now what happens, when an inventor without deep knowledge and experience constructs a steam device, makes it unaccessible and then lets unexperienced scientist measure the steam? Most scientists expect that

Re: Aw: Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe

2011-09-22 Thread Horace Heffner
On Sep 22, 2011, at 6:24 AM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote: - Original Nachricht Von: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com An: vortex-l@eskimo.com Datum: 22.09.2011 15:53 Betreff: Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote

Re: Aw: [Vo]:About measurement of steam with Galantini probe

2011-09-22 Thread Jed Rothwell
Horace Heffner wrote: Some questions for you and other self-appointed experts here: This remark seems to have some emotional content. Darn right it does. I am annoyed. DO you know of any requirement for anyone here on vortex-l to be an expert to comment? Not to comment. I have no