RE: uoting from the Re: Ed's Storms hope

2005-08-04 Thread John . Rudiger
technologies. Kind Regards, John Rudiger Perth WA Ph:-08 9232 7150 Fax:- 08 9232 7155 -Original Message- From: Wesley Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 3 August 2005 11:29 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: uoting from the Re: Ed's Storms hope Black light powers

uoting from the Re: Ed's Storms hope

2005-08-02 Thread RC Macaulay
Mike Carrell wrote.. MC: Jed Rothwell has been beating this drum for years, lamenting that aseach year passes without measurable progress thousands suffer and die inAfrica and other developing countries. And he is right, so far. Jed wrote abook and posted it for download on lenr-canr

Re: uoting from the Re: Ed's Storms hope

2005-08-02 Thread Mike Carrell
Blank - Original Message - From: RC Macaulay Subject: uoting from the Re: Ed's Storms hope Mike Carrell wrote.. MC: Jed Rothwell has been beating this drum for years, lamenting that as each year passes without measurable progress thousands suffer and die in Africa and other developing

Re: uoting from the Re: Ed's Storms hope

2005-08-02 Thread Wesley Bruce
Black light powers Randell Mills is very smart he went around the US patent embargo by filing in Australia. Aussy's will rule the global; energy market. Now if I could only convince a few other Aussys, including the PM that Its real. RC Macaulay wrote: Mike Carrell wrote.. MC: I repeat.

Re: Ed's Storms hope: Recycling

2005-08-01 Thread Mike Carrell
From: Michael Huffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Ed's Storms hope: Recycling Mike Carrell wrote: Wesley, you are also correct and after I wrote my piece I remembered that at least one auto manufacturer is producing cars that can easily be [partially] disassembled for segregating

Re: Ed's Storms hope: Recycling

2005-08-01 Thread Michael Huffman
Mike Carrell wrote: Most interesting and another illustration of my point that recycling is not simple at all when you take it seriously. I am surprised that the amount of gallium or arsenic from microchips could possibly alter the metallurgical qualities of

Re: Ed's Storms hope: Recycling

2005-08-01 Thread Mike Carrell
From: Michael Huffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Ed's Storms hope: Recycling Mike Carrell wrote: Most interesting and another illustration of my point that recycling is not simple at all when you take it seriously. I am surprised that the amount

Re: Ed's Storms hope: Recycling

2005-07-31 Thread Mike Carrell
From: Wesley Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Ed's Storms hope: Recycling Mike your perfectly correct but there's a push in industry to design easily recyclable things from computers to fridges to cars. The key is to not mix things up so they can be pulled apart by a single person

Re: Ed's Storms hope: Recycling

2005-07-31 Thread Michael Huffman
Mike Carrell wrote: Wesley, you are also correct and after I wrote my piece I remembered that at least one auto manufacturer is producing cars that can easily be [partially] disassembled for segregating into recycling programs. A steel engineer whose major client was an automobile

Ed's Storms hope

2005-07-30 Thread RC Macaulay
Ed Storms wrote in the " are things really getting too complicated?" thread. opefully, my comments can generate ome discussion on Vortex. After all, the usual discussion of the arious scientific theories will have little importance if these social and economic problems are not solved. I

Re: Ed's Storms hope

2005-07-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentlemen- This is one thing that I strongly believe in- I think we should have one hundred percent recycling. IT can never work at anthing less than county or state level. I do believe it would create jobs at all levels of education. It

Re: Ed's Storms hope

2005-07-30 Thread Edmund Storms
A very good example, Richard. The question is, how can we get our leaders to go back to doing what they were elected to do, i.e. take care of the nation, instead of doing everything to take care of their own reelection by raising money and appearing Godly? To go one step further, the issue

Re: Ed's Storms hope

2005-07-30 Thread Terry Blanton
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gentlemen- This is one thing that I strongly believe in- I think we should have one hundred percent recycling. Hear here! When I was young, long ago, I used to take my toys apart. Those little tin vehicles had wind-up motors and were made in Japan, a

Re: Ed's Storms hope: Recycling

2005-07-30 Thread Mike Carrell
Guess what, guys, recycling is a complex, nasty problem, not easily solved, as difficult as anything else in society, and screaming at the government isn't going to fix it. Like many things, market necessity is the driver and things happen when it hurts enough. Yes, the government can help with

Re: Ed's Storms hope

2005-07-30 Thread Wesley Bruce
What's the key to recycling? The energy and transport costs involved. Distributed resources have a large transport energy cost. If CF reduces energy costs in transport by 60%, as Jed says it should, a lot of recycling will become viable. RC Macaulay wrote: Ed Storms wrote in the are things

Re: Ed's Storms hope: Recycling

2005-07-30 Thread Wesley Bruce
Mike your perfectly correct but there's a push in industry to design easily recyclable things from computers to fridges to cars. The key is to not mix things up so they can be pulled apart by a single person with some hand tools or a robot built for the job. There's an amazing amount of RD