Re: My comments on Intelligent Design

2005-09-08 Thread OrionWorks
> From: thomas malloy > > Steven Johnson posted > > > In my book: Recognizing one's "self" is to recognize > > the existence of one's soul. The fact that they may > > not be capable of reading Hebrew is a trivial factor > > in the greater scheme of things. > > > > I can't read Hebrew either. >

My comments on Intelligent Design

2005-09-08 Thread thomas malloy
Steven Johnson posted In my book: Recognizing one's "self" is to recognize the existence of one's soul. The fact that they may not be capable of reading Hebrew is a trivial factor in the greater scheme of things. I can't read Hebrew either. I can't make the leap from recognizing one's self a

Re: My comments on Intelligent Design

2005-09-08 Thread Harry Veeder
OrionWorks wrote: >> From: thomas malloy > >> Parksie was up to his usual shtick. IMHO, you have to be >> blind in order to miss that the biological mechanism is >> just a container for the soul. Consequently a Chimp may >> share 99% of it's DNA with us, but it lacks the thing >> which makes us h

RE: My comments on Intelligent Design

2005-09-08 Thread R . O . Cornwall
5 08:48 To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: My comments on Intelligent Design Parksie was up to his usual shtick. IMHO, you have to be blind in order to miss that the biological mechanism is just a container for the soul. Consequently a Chimp may share 99% of it's DNA with us, but it lacks the thin

Re: My comments on Intelligent Design

2005-09-08 Thread OrionWorks
> From: thomas malloy > Parksie was up to his usual shtick. IMHO, you have to be > blind in order to miss that the biological mechanism is > just a container for the soul. Consequently a Chimp may > share 99% of it's DNA with us, but it lacks the thing > which makes us human, a soul. This is the

Re: My comments on Intelligent Design

2005-09-08 Thread Wesley Bruce
thomas malloy wrote: Parksie was up to his usual shtick. IMHO, you have to be blind in order to miss that the biological mechanism is just a container for the soul. Consequently a Chimp may share 99% of it's DNA with us, but it lacks the thing which makes us human, a soul. This is the same me

My comments on Intelligent Design

2005-09-08 Thread thomas malloy
Parksie was up to his usual shtick. IMHO, you have to be blind in order to miss that the biological mechanism is just a container for the soul. Consequently a Chimp may share 99% of it's DNA with us, but it lacks the thing which makes us human, a soul. This is the same mentality which labels th