thomas malloy wrote:
A nano tech nuclear bomb?
Ah, here is a novel nanoscale approach: gravitational collapse. Why destroy
a city when you can implode the whole planet? Or maybe the whole solar system.
Jean-Paul just sent me an ICCF11 paper that needs editing:
Stanislav V. Adamenko, et al.
It would most probably not require a critical mass as with fission, that leaves fusion.
ChrisJed Rothwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
thomas malloy wrote:>A nano tech nuclear bomb? As I understand it, a critical mass is required >to make the bomb explode.Good point.> Does anyone have an explanati
thomas malloy wrote:
Jed Rothwell posted
Here is part of an FAQ recently mailed to me by the International
Association of Nanotechnology <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
3. Is it possible to make nano nuclear bomb, using nanotechnology which
could release massive lethal nuclear radiation ? Yes.
A nan
thomas malloy wrote:
A nano tech nuclear bomb? As I understand it, a critical mass is required
to make the bomb explode.
Good point.
Does anyone have an explanation of how something like this would work?
Maybe you don't wanna know.
Perhaps there is something on the Association's web sit
Jed Rothwell posted
Here is part of an FAQ recently mailed to me by the International
Association of Nanotechnology <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
3. Is it possible to make nano nuclear bomb, using nanotechnology
which could release massive lethal nuclear radiation ? Yes.
A nano tech nuclear bomb? A
Here is part of an FAQ recently mailed to me by the International
Association of Nanotechnology <[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
"Frequently Asked Questions about Nanotechnology and its impact on Society
1. How much money has been funded in Nanotechnology worldwide? $4.3
billion a year
2. How much is
6 matches
Mail list logo
