RC Macaulay wrote:
Wes and Fred,
Force field reaction may be closer to describing the event.
Yep but what lies at the heart of and defines the field, if not zpe then
it must be something very new.
Generally when we get a directional beam we get a flow of something.
Photons, electrons, etc. I
Wes and Fred,
Force field reaction may be closer to describing the
event.
Richard
- Original Message -
From:
Frederick Sparber
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 05, 2005 6:30
AM
Subject: Re: Podkletnov's Disks
Wesley Bruce
Wesley Bruce wrote:
>
> No drive can be truly reactionless!
> We are really talking of drives that
> that that interact electrostatically with
> waves or photons.
> These become invisible or substantial reaction mass.
>
Agreed Wes. I think Dr. (ms?) Li left NASA and went back to China to pu
thomas malloy wrote:
Bruce posted;
Don't call me bruce! Call me wes!
Podkletnov's device could be made into a
reactionless drive if we can get reliable mass production of his disks
and steady high voltage power supply. I'm in corrispondance with Dr
Podklenov
This is very interesting. Have
In reply to thomas malloy's message of Thu, 3 Nov 2005 01:55:10
-0600:
Hi,
[snip]
>Bruce posted;
>
>Podkletnov's device could be made into a
>reactionless drive if we can get reliable mass production of his disks
>and steady high voltage power supply.
[snip]
This is an ideal application for an i
Bruce posted;
Podkletnov's device could be made into a
reactionless drive if we can get reliable mass production of his disks
and steady high voltage power supply. I'm in corrispondance with Dr
Podklenov
This is very interesting. Have you observed this unidirectional
force? Do you have an expl
6 matches
Mail list logo
