Thank you so much Walter for your in-depth and thoughtful reply. It may
take me some time to process what you've written.
If you are of the opinion that the published work itself is always an
adequate guide as to the details of an experiment, may I direct your
attention to a wonderful little
Steven Krivit wrote:
-
V -
I was havin' a chat will fellow CF author the other day about proper
scientific refutations. He brought to my attention that a valid refutation
of a claim is one which identifies a specific error of procedure in an
experiment, such as a specific error pertaining
Walter Faxon wrote..
Clearly the editors of general sciencejournals do not
themselves have the expertise to directly criticize themethodology of most
CF papers. It's much simpler to rely on theirprevious
conclusions.
Howdy Walter..
Oh! Were it that simple. I mentioned to Steven Krivit that
V -
I was havin' a chat will fellow CF author the other day about proper
scientific refutations. He brought to my attention that a valid refutation
of a claim is one which identifies a specific error of procedure in an
experiment, such as a specific error pertaining to calorimetry
4 matches
Mail list logo
