On Sep 29, 2009, at 12:00 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
2009/9/28 Horace Heffner :
On Sep 27, 2009, at 5:49 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
One thing that could be done now, and probably wouldn't be a
waste would
be
algoil. This could make a significant dent in fossil fuel
consumption, and
bec
2009/9/28 Horace Heffner :
>
> On Sep 27, 2009, at 5:49 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
>> One thing that could be done now, and probably wouldn't be a waste would
>> be
>> algoil. This could make a significant dent in fossil fuel consumption, and
>> because it targets cars and trucks, isn't likely t
On Sep 27, 2009, at 5:49 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
[snip]
One thing that could be done now, and probably wouldn't be a waste
would be
algoil. This could make a significant dent in fossil fuel
consumption, and
because it targets cars and trucks, isn't likely to be quickly
replaced by
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 27 Sep 2009 17:28:25 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>> ...however I think that CF will eventually prevail, hence the
>> Manhattan style
>> project you have in mind could turn out to be a huge white elephant
>> within just
>> a few years. IOW It might pay to wait
On Sep 27, 2009, at 2:00 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:35:06
-0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Given no
other major energy development, like cold fusion, an all out
international effort should be waged to develop a solar
infrastructure.
...how
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:35:06 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
>Given no
>other major energy development, like cold fusion, an all out
>international effort should be waged to develop a solar infrastructure.
...however I think that CF will eventually prevail, hence the Ma
On Sep 27, 2009, at 6:43 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Horace
You may be highly disappointed running at 1.4 volts/cell.
But - a few months ago - were you not promoting Nocera's half-cell
advance?
He claims a 90% reduction on the anode.
If incorporated, and even if less than 90% that should red
Horace
> You may be highly disappointed running at 1.4 volts/cell.
But - a few months ago - were you not promoting Nocera's half-cell advance?
He claims a 90% reduction on the anode.
If incorporated, and even if less than 90% that should reduce the overall
potential significantly - perhaps to
--- On Sun, 9/27/09, Harvey Norris wrote:
> From: Harvey Norris
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Car Alternators Vs Old Style Generators
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Sunday, September 27, 2009, 2:46 AM
>
> > You may be highly disappointed running at 1.4
> > volts/cell
> You may be highly disappointed running at 1.4
> volts/cell.
Well aware of all the limitations involved here, the use of a variac to try the
schemes from the power grid ect. I have done all of these things before. A
simple comparison here is apt however. A typical industrial size browns gas
On Sep 26, 2009, at 12:23 PM, Harvey Norris wrote:
Because the (car) alternator has its field regulated, it is
designed to constantly produce 12 or 13 volts, probably even at the
lowest rpm available to it by idle of the automobile.
The PMG site however claims that high amperage extraction
Harvey Norris wrote:
> --- On Sat, 9/26/09, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
>
>> From: Stephen A. Lawrence Subject: Re: [Vo]:Car
>> Alternators Vs Old Style Generators To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Date:
>> Saturday, September 26, 2009, 10:05 AM
>>
>>
>>
--- On Sat, 9/26/09, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
> From: Stephen A. Lawrence
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Car Alternators Vs Old Style Generators
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Date: Saturday, September 26, 2009, 10:05 AM
>
>
> Chris Zell wrote:
> > The last car to use gener
Chris Zell wrote:
> The last car to use generators that I'm aware of was the VW Bug. I
> suppose alternators were cheaper to build.
That would make sense. Once cheap reliable high current diodes became
available, the alternator design appears simpler.
On the other hand, I've always heard that
The last car to use generators that I'm aware of was the VW Bug. I suppose
alternators were cheaper to build.
ficient. -JO-
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:28:03 -0400
> From: sa...@pobox.com
> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Car Alternators Vs Old Style Generators
>
>
>
> Harvey Norris wrote:
> > Went to Auburn Indiana Classic Car show in early Sept... The cars
Harvey Norris wrote:
> Went to Auburn Indiana Classic Car show in early Sept... The cars
> back then had a generator instead of an alternator. Now there are
> claims from Hydrogen Garage LLC, that adding a water cell 12 volt
> electrolysis as an alternator load, and by the engine using the HHO
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
