Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.. \"openly\" demonstrated at MIT

2012-02-02 Thread Peter Gluck
7;s unlikely any mainstream news organizations > will take the story seriously if the quoted source is a dedicated > cold-fusion website. > > -- > Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:00:39 -0500 > From: r...@hush.com > To: robert.leguil...@hotmail.com > Subje

RE: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.. \"openly\" demonstrated at MIT

2012-02-02 Thread Robert Leguillon
on website. Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 00:00:39 -0500 From: r...@hush.com To: robert.leguil...@hotmail.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.. \"openly\" demonstrated at MIT Hi Robert, I just got an update: the NANOR used in the present ongoing MIT Demonstrati

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.. "openly" demonstrated at MIT

2012-02-02 Thread Alain Sepeda
looks like the scenario of the easiest hot fusion... maybe it is simply a journalist that invent whe he cannot fill the blanks... seen no data on the kind of LENR at MIT IAP 2012. CF times seems the only source. who have other non incestuous source? 2012/2/2 Robert Leguillon > An article at *g

RE: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.. "openly" demonstrated at MIT

2012-02-02 Thread Robert Leguillon
http://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&u=www.greenstyle.it%2Ffusione-fredda-successo-per-un-test-effettuato-al-mit-7376.html From: robert.leguil...@hotmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject

RE: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.. "openly" demonstrated at MIT

2012-02-02 Thread Robert Leguillon
An article at greenstyle.it seems to indicate that JET Energy's demonstration was not hydrogen-nickel, but deuterium+tritium=helium. Do we have any such confirmation? R.L. __ This is the article in question: original - http://www.greenstyle.it/fusione-fredda-success

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.. "openly" demonstrated at MIT

2012-02-01 Thread mixent
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 1 Feb 2012 16:18:58 -0800: Hi, [snip] >-Original Message- >From: mix...@bigpond.com > >... this implies a negative ion, which I think means that Rossi >subscribes to the "shrinking negative ion theory". > > >Robin, > >... sure you did not mean to

RE: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.. "openly" demonstrated at MIT

2012-02-01 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com ... this implies a negative ion, which I think means that Rossi subscribes to the "shrinking negative ion theory". Robin, ... sure you did not mean to say the "minimal hydrino hydride theory" :-) J. <>

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.."openly" demonstrated at MIT

2012-02-01 Thread mixent
In reply to Ron Kita's message of Wed, 1 Feb 2012 07:10:26 -0500: Hi, [snip] >Greetings Vortex: > >http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html > >Great news, >Ron Kita, Chiralex Quote (on Rossi E-cat):- "RADIO FREQUENCY GENERATORS -- He claims that the radio frequency generator allows the forces that wo

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.."openly" demonstrated at MIT

2012-02-01 Thread Peter Gluck
Sorry, Ron but is this Pd-D or Ni-H, aqueous or vapor phas, at what power level? I don't find any relevant information by simple fast search. Thank you for any data Peter On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 2:10 PM, Ron Kita wrote: > Greetings Vortex: > > http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html > > Great news,

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.."openly" demonstrated at MIT

2012-02-01 Thread Rich Murray
er, I have a bad feeling about this... within mutual service, Rich Murray rmfor...@gmail.com On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 8:40 AM, Harry Veeder wrote: > No pictures of the demonstration? > > harry > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Ron Kita wrote: >> Greetings Vortex: >> >> http://world.std.com/~mi

Re: [Vo]:Cold Fusion.."openly" demonstrated at MIT

2012-02-01 Thread Harry Veeder
No pictures of the demonstration? harry On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 7:10 AM, Ron Kita wrote: > Greetings Vortex: > > http://world.std.com/~mica/cft.html > > Great news, > Ron Kita, Chiralex