In reply to Alan Fletcher's message of Mon, 20 May 2013 20:30:59 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
:)
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 8:11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot Cat report published -- Final Ragone Plot
In reply to Alan Fletcher's message of Mon, 20 May 2013 13:20:06
I think
Final Plot -- based on the igure in the paper
http://lenr.qumbu.com/130520_ragone_01.png
That's nifty! Thanks.
This is Fig. 9 from the paper, expanded to fit their data.
- Jed
Can you suggest a caption (with the cite of the original in smaller type), eg
Indication of anomalous heat energy production in a reactor device
containing hydrogen loaded nickel powder, Levi et al.
Fig 9 expanded to show the Ragone plot of the eCat test, March 2013.
- Original Message
]
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 1:20 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot Cat report published -- Final Ragone Plot
Final Plot -- based on the igure in the paper
http://lenr.qumbu.com/130520_ragone_01.png
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 2:22:22 PM
Alan, can you also put in a conventional nuclear reactor used for
Electrical power?
Use the nuclear radiation symbol for traditional nuclear power!
That would pretty much be the picture that is worth a thousand
In reply to Alan Fletcher's message of Mon, 20 May 2013 13:20:06 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Final Plot -- based on the igure in the paper
http://lenr.qumbu.com/130520_ragone_01.png
I think the impact of this would be even greater on a linear rather than
logarithmic plot. :)
Regards,
Robin van
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 8:11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot Cat report published -- Final Ragone Plot
In reply to Alan Fletcher's message of Mon, 20 May 2013 13:20:06
I think the impact of this would be even greater on a linear rather
than logarithmic plot
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 8:11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot Cat report published -- Final Ragone Plot
In reply to Alan Fletcher's message of Mon, 20 May 2013 13:20:06
I think the impact
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:03 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2013 8:11:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hot Cat report published -- Final Ragone Plot
In reply
Allan's comparison that end up in Forbe's website is not accurate. The
energy density is the upper bound for a week of use, not the actual value.
It was turned off after the test. The fuel did not run out. If we are to
believe Rossi's claims that it last 6 months, the scale should be pushed
25x
Actually, that consider the device's weight. So, as Rossi claims 1 gram. It
should push at 1000x or 3 orders of magnitude beyond those ~25x I posted
in the last comment. It should be to the left and about the same height as
uranium.
2013/5/21 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
Allan's
12 matches
Mail list logo
