I'm surprised that this article has not been commented on yet...
We now have a PhD condensed matter physicist at NRL validating, unequivocally,
a LENR effect, and that they have also established theoretical basis; their DFT
simulations agree with empirical results.
“The Naval Research Labs (NRL
Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint [mailto:zeropo...@charter.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2015 11:44 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:LENR theory
I'm surprised that this article has not been commented on yet...
We now have a PhD condensed matter physicist at NRL
I think this paper may well be the most important one since Pons and
Fleischmann's original announcement.
Pity that Vortex didn't want to display it as it sent it here before
sending it to ECatWorld.
It would be much easier to discuss with the full paper visible.
-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
> Then somebody suggested that NRL should try an alloy of 90% Pd and 10% Rh.
> The very first such alloy cathode they tried yielded over 10,000 Joules of
> excess thermal energy NRL christened this cathode with the name Eve...
There is an ol
Regarding:
"A departure from equilibrium must be established that will permit an
external energy source (eg. the DC power supply in an electrolysis
experiment and/or a pair of low power lasers as in the Letts/Hagelstein two
laser experiment) to feed energy into the H-H or D-D stretching mode
vibra
For comparison, Rossi stated his current theory in a recent interview.
"“My theory is that a proton from a hydrogen atom enters, by the quantum
tunneling effect, into a nucleus of Li-7 (i.e., a lithium nucleus of
atomic weight 7), forming a nucleus of Be-8 (i.e., a beryllium nucleus
of atomic
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:53 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint
wrote:
"... a number of more interesting effects." What could be MORE interesting
> than excess heat/low energy nuclear reactions???
Some questions are better left unasked. One of the sisters could be
Pandora.
Eric
There's plenty of observations that are more interesting than excess heat,
because, by itself, it is not proof LENR is nuclear. Radiations,
transmutations, isotopic shifts would all be more interesting than just
heat. Or, even proof that the excess heat was coming without nuclear
involvement - ag
Where is this from? Link?
On Tuesday, October 6, 2015, a.ashfield wrote:
> I sent this information directly to Vortex but it never appeared.
> Now you can see it here.
> http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/10/06/louis-dechario-of-us-naval-sea-systems-command-navsea-on-replicating-pons-and-fleischma
pandora, indeed.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 1:53 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint
> wrote:
>
> "... a number of more interesting effects." What could be MORE interesting
>> than excess heat/low energy nuclear reactions???
>
>
> Some questions are better left
I was referring in a very roundabout way to new military applications,
although I doubt that allusion was at all clear to anyone.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 5:32 PM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
> There's plenty of observations that are more interesting than excess heat,
> because, by itself, it is not proof
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:55 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
For comparison, Rossi stated his current theory in a recent interview.
>
> "“My theory is that a proton from a hydrogen atom enters, by the quantum
> tunneling effect, into a nucleus of Li-7 (i.e., a lithium nucleus of atomic
> weight 7), forming
If LENR is producing mesons, pions, and muons, how does that effect
reaction types?
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 3:55 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
>
> For comparison, Rossi stated his current theory in a recent interview.
>>
>> "“My theory is that a prot
If you provide several balanced reactions that involve mesons, pions and
muons, I can take them as a model and attempt to generalize.
Eric
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> If LENR is producing mesons, pions, and muons, how does that effect
> reaction types?
>
> On Tue, Oct 6
This is the question that I am asking of you. If we assume that Holmlid is
correct in the particles he is seeing, what does that mean for the types of
nuclear reaction that result?
On Wed, Oct 7, 2015 at 1:19 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
> If you provide several balanced reactions that involve mesons,
hey isn't 1 excess joules per gram significantly less than energy
density of gas? This could all just be chemical. (hat tip popeye)
On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 8:15 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> If LENR is producing mesons, pions, and muons, how does that effect
> reaction types?
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 20
From: Eric Walker
*
* If you provide several balanced reactions that involve mesons, pions
and muons, I can take them as a model and attempt to generalize.
For all practical purposes in LENR – we can ignore all mesons and pions and
focus solely on the muon. See the Wiki entry for
Why is everyone getting excited? Louis hasn't even claimed radiation or
transmutation or significant energy density beyond something that can be
chemically explained. It's just an informal email with vague hints about
other things. The only thing that was particularly exciting was that he
think
From: Blaze Spinnaker
Why is everyone getting excited? Louis hasn't even claimed radiation or
transmutation or significant energy density beyond something that can be
chemically explained. It's just an informal email with vague hints about other
things. The only thing that was particularly
When I read all the theories and how they conflict or partly agree with me
*I wonder why we do not hear about anyone replicating Holmlid's experiment.?
I am not able to set up the required components or conduct the measurements
required. However, it amazes me that we do not hear others doing it -
p
20 matches
Mail list logo