tenants of solid geometry apply to real
> spcce
>
>
>
> Bob cook
>
> -
>
>
>
> *From: *Jürg Wyttenbach
> *Sent: *Saturday, May 6, 2023 11:00 AM
> *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Link between em and
mo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Link between em and qm
Stefan
There is no such thing as a common velocity for 3 different points on a
sphere except for one axes angular motion (w instead of v)
J.W.
On 06.05.2023 15:33, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
> I think the following p
geometry may come together in
the concept of REALITY.
Bob Cook
From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe<mailto:stefan.ita...@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 8, 2023 7:16 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Link between em and qm
It's kind of crazy how th
It's kind of crazy how the brain works. It parses your complaints and then
when I wake up I see things even more clear. So the addition to the setup
are that we need to constrain interactions in the rest frame of the current
moving at C (you can consider a limiting argument to make this stringent)
I added a new name for this paper a new link I have different names on this
one,
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1GChNtVtTgvQzF4jSu1tSjCx5ub9lu4RD/view?usp=share_link
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 9:05 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Also the potential is not correct...
>
> If you do it quark like 2/3 2/3
You may have a point but I updated the paper and I hope that it does not
have this property now. The last update was at 20:34 CET
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 9:05 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Also the potential is not correct...
>
> If you do it quark like 2/3 2/3 -1/3 you will get 2*(2/9) - 4/9 = 0!
Also the potential is not correct...
If you do it quark like 2/3 2/3 -1/3 you will get 2*(2/9) - 4/9 = 0!
because 2/3 are repulsive...
You should always write down all details of what you exactly name how
and what e.g. potential means.
The Dirac equation is plain nonsense as the e/p magneti
You are right, the paths are more complex than just on a sphere, we build
it up as an addition of such paths.
On Sat, May 6, 2023 at 8:00 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Stefan
>
> There is no such thing as a common velocity for 3 different points on a
> sphere except for one axes angular motion (w
Stefan
There is no such thing as a common velocity for 3 different points on a
sphere except for one axes angular motion (w instead of v)
J.W.
On 06.05.2023 15:33, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
I think the following paper illustrate an avenue to find the
connection between EM and QM now t
9 matches
Mail list logo
