- Original Message
From: Robin van Spaandonk In reply to Jones Beene's message
IOW - the simplest explanation for LENR is that it is the result of a
version of the Oppenheimer-Phillips effect - such that the neutron is
stripped non-thermally from deuterium, due to containment and
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 9 May 2009 06:04:41 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
By always there - this would imply that it serves as a trigger for D+D
fusion, where the hot alpha from the Pd reacts with an adjacent 'target
deuteron' - which is kind of a like nanoscale inertial confinement
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 08 May 2009 11:07:04 -0400:
Hi Jed,
[snip]
I should add that Martin Fleischmann also thinks
highly of Mengoli. He considers him one of the
world's top electrochemists. Mengoli retired several years ago.
At issue has arisen in the discussion of this
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
the palladium isn't the fuel, it's just a catalyst. That is true. Or at
least, we hope that is true.
I am NOT a big believer in Ockhams razor, but it firmly suggests that
palladium is the fuel.
IOW - the simplest explanation for LENR is that it is
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 8 May 2009 08:29:33 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
IOW - the simplest explanation for LENR is that it is the result of a
version of the Oppenheimer-Phillips effect - such that the neutron is
stripped non-thermally from deuterium, due to containment and near field
5 matches
Mail list logo
