Fran,
I fully agree that any QM explanation supports the Casimir cavity
interpretation, and even fractional hydrogen and IRH, if you throw out most
of Mills' fluff (he claims not to believe in QM and then goes on to reword
it).
That QM explanation supports the Casimir cavity interpretation
Jones,
I just wanted to remind all of the 3rd alternative which is a
QM based exploitation of Zero Point posited in Jan Naudts paper , Moller's MAHG
, Haisch & Moddel prototype, and "Cavity QED" by Zofia Bialynicka-Birula. The
QM represents the accumulation and segregation of di
implifies the entire perspective.
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 5:17 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:MgH2 as hydrogen source
Jay,
Interesting idea, but "Chan" raises many red flags. Are there pictures
Chan has put up a website, but there's nothing there yet. claims he's too
busy to engage in conversations.
http://chanfusionpower.chan.host-ed.me/
-m
From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 3:18 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [V
Jay,
Interesting idea, but "Chan" raises many red flags. Are there pictures?
Video? Website?
Can you explain how MgH2 would relate to QM in particular?
From: Jay Caplan
I'd like to solicit comments from the list re the Chan/Phen/Ortiz postings
using MgH2 as H source
http://www.e
5 matches
Mail list logo