Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

e: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons Thanks for finding out. harry On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:16 PM, JonesBeene <jone...@pacbell.net<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote: From: H LV<mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com> A beam of electrons should bend downward in earths gravity. Has

Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

Thanks for finding out. harry On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 3:16 PM, JonesBeene wrote: > *From: *H LV > > > > A beam of electrons should bend downward in earths gravity. Has that ever > been measured? > > > > > > > > > Experiments to determine the Force of

RE: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

From: H LV A beam of electrons should bend downward in earths gravity. Has that ever been measured? Experiments to determine the Force of Gravity on Single Electrons and Positrons • FRED C. WITTEBORN •  & WILLIAM M. FAIRBANK • Nature volume 220, pages 436–440 (02 November 1968) My comment.

Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

-- > *From:* John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 30, 2018 3:54 AM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons > > From the patent... "a free electron has inertial mass but not > gravitational mass.&

Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

The forces are different by 10*36, so comparisons are impossible to measure. From: John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 3:54 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons >From the patent..

Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

>From the patent... "a free electron has inertial mass but not gravitational mass." and "Thus, a free electron is not gravitationally attracted to ordinary matter. " Really? Can that really add up? Pretty sure this is not very much in agreement with conventional theory. John Berry On Tue,

RE: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

:08 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons NASA has funded antigravity resarch, but what is missing is any announcement of big success. Anyway, unified field theory research gets mostly ignored; started with Boscovich (1758),

Re: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

NASA has funded antigravity resarch, but what is missing is any announcement of big success. Anyway, unified field theory research gets mostly ignored; started with Boscovich (1758), how gravity is a residual of electricity from Boscovich theory explained at: Theoretical confirmation of the

RE: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

Bob, There is a fair amount of both brilliance (cough, cough) and silliness in Mills hand-waving. His misidentification of the Higgs boson is in the later category. As for the “antigravity electron” see his patent app (thanks to the spice man for this) Patent WO1995032021A1 - Apparatus and

RE: [Vo]:No mass !?! Dirac electrons

Jones— For a nice qualitative summary of Mill’s theory see the following link: http://www.brettholverstott.com/annoucements/2017/8/5/summary-of-randell-millss-unified-theory Superconductivity of planar molecules (with electrons in a 2-D system ) are discussed in item 12 of the summary. Bob