Re: [Vo]:Randy Mills' opinion

2011-04-20 Thread mixent
In reply to Peter Gluck's message of Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:16:04 +0300: Hi, [snip] That doesn't necessarily mean that either of them are correct. ;) >Dr. Randell Mills has a message to those who try to >connect in anyway his work with that of Rossi: > >To me any intentional inference to hydrinos

Re: [Vo]:Randy Mills' opinion

2011-04-20 Thread Peter Gluck
If you will ask my opinion about the issue - I will say that the two processes are different and independent. Amd there will be no World court case. But please be nice and don't ask, I belong to a non-prophet association. Peter On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 7:37 PM, Jones Beene wrote: > Very clear! >

RE: [Vo]:Randy Mills' opinion

2011-04-20 Thread Jones Beene
Very clear! And exactly what anyone would expect at this stage of the game from both Mills and Rossi, no ? 'Never show your hand too soon' if it is a poker game. When the issue gets to the World court in a few years, Mills vs. Defkalion - I hope that someone will remember this. BTW