In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 06 May 2011 12:56:56 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Deuterium is cheap, but helium-3 is potentially worth a fortune. If they
>can tune cells to crank that out, that might be fantastic! I do not
>think we would need He3 reactors for ordinary applications if we have
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 6 May 2011 06:47:51 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>-Original Message-
>From: mix...@bigpond.com
>
>>Ed Storms suggests:
>
>>H-e-H --> D
>
>The problem with this one is that the energy is all taken by the neutrino
>
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 6 May 2011 07:53:43 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:22 PM, wrote:
>
>> Electron annihilation doesn't produce a 1.22 MeV photon. It produces two 511
>> keV
>> photons (180 deg. apart).
>
>I knew that. What I should have said was 1.22 MeV
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Really? what does it cost in Atlanta ?
When you are drinking single malt scotch, you should always use heavy
water ice cubes.
T
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
> Actually, seriously, deuterium is pretty cheap ...
Really? what does it cost in Atlanta ?
...or is 'pretty cheap' more a reflection of your excellent financial health
?
Neither heavy water nor D2 could be called a bargain out here. Online, D2O
Jones Beene wrote:
If the energy seen by Rossi were due to P-e-P, he could make a lot more
money selling the deuterium than providing heat ;)
... hey ... come to think of it ... you don't think that the deuterium tank
seen at one time in Rossi's setup was indicating that he could be harvesting
t
>From Jones:
...
> ... hey ... come to think of it ... you don't think that the
> deuterium tank seen at one time in Rossi's setup was indicating
> that he could be harvesting the ash ? nah...
>
> The excuse given at the time was to quench the reaction, but
> think about it, do you quench fire w
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
>Ed Storms suggests:
>H-e-H --> D
The problem with this one is that the energy is all taken by the neutrino
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction#The_pep_re
action
Robin,
Yes. As far back as 1996 Mitchell Swart
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:22 PM, wrote:
> Electron annihilation doesn't produce a 1.22 MeV photon. It produces two 511
> keV
> photons (180 deg. apart).
I knew that. What I should have said was 1.22 MeV of energy. Which
would also be wrong since the spin energy has to go somewhere. Where
do
Robin,
I agree that if anti-matter has positive mass there can't be any in an H nucleus. But I'm not sure
anti-matters mass is proven to be positive experimentally. If Mill's 5th force experiment is
correct then gravitational mass doesn't equal inertial mass and all bets are off. If you search
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 5 May 2011 18:28:59 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
>> Positron annihilation would have been seen by V&B, and one of their meters
>> was designed for that.
>
>Ah, but was it averaging or reading in real time? Rem
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 05 May 2011 14:51:34 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
>Ed Storms suggests:
>
>H-e-H --> D
>
>- Jed
The problem with this one is that the energy is all taken by the neutrino (See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton%E2%80%93proton_chain_reaction#The_pep_reaction).
Regards
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 5 May 2011 09:55:57 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>15) The Brightsen model of "antimatter clusters" within the H nucleus.
I have never given this much credence, because anti-matter has positive mass, so
his nuclei would weigh too much.
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 5 May 2011 08:44:02 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>13) This floor is always missing
..or just the exit as the elevator goes past? ;)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
I had a dream the other night about quantum weapons. These would be
weapons which utilize "the observer" to collapse wave equations at
will. Now, use your imagination on this one.
Ever see "Wizards"?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0076929/
It had a remarkable ending when the good wizard, brother
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 3:11 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
> Positron annihilation would have been seen by V&B, and one of their meters
> was designed for that.
Ah, but was it averaging or reading in real time? Remember "The
Event" in the January test? The anecdotal 1.22 MeV photon may be
opening a di
I got an update from Ed on this reaction, and I will work it into the list
on the next update.
> Yes, but I wonder if Ed knows of a version that does not release a
> positron?
> Positron annihilation would have been seen by V&B, and one of their
> meters
> was designed for that.
> On the #
Yes, but I wonder if Ed knows of a version that does not release a positron?
Positron annihilation would have been seen by V&B, and one of their meters
was designed for that.
On the #2 spot on the list, this reaction is listed without the electron
mentioned, but with the preface saying that any o
Ed Storms suggests:
H-e-H --> D
- Jed
17) IFM
Good work-in-progress compilation Jones. Thanks for "volunteering".
It's astonishing to me to see the number of different theories being
explored. Some obviously have at present garnered more respect than
others. But who really knows at present what combination of the above
(or perhaps none at all
A few additions and improvements.
The Modus Operandi List
Anyone approaching Ni-H from a theoretical perspective may benefit from a
list of possible "gainful routes" which are either non-nuclear,
"new-nuclear", supra-chemical, or a hybrid.
Many of these processes can overlap or can be applied
22 matches
Mail list logo
