In reply to Keith Nagel's message of Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:35:14 -0400:
Hi Keith,
[snip]
>Hi Robin.
>
>Cagles theory seems to fail in the case of static charges?
>
>For if lambda=h/mv, and v=0, lambda = infinity for a static charge.
>
>So then, all like static charges would attract by Cagles general
van Spaandonk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 6:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Geometry of the Casimir Effect
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 25 Aug 2004 06:50:42 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
> Short-Range Electron Attracti
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 25 Aug 2004 06:50:42 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
> Short-Range Electron Attractive Force
>
>by Ken Shoulders
>
>Statement of Action:
>
>There is an attractive force found between closely spaced, free el
At 02:38 pm 25-08-04 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi Jones Et Al.
>
>Sorry, I've been too busy torturing Powerpoint for an upcoming command
>performance to give the paper I linked more than a cursory examination.
>It seemed to address some specifics of how to calculate casimir forces
>from a given geometry.
and papers,
would that I had the time to devote to properly evaluating this
excellent experimental work.
K.
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 9:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vortex
Subject: Re: Geometry of the Casimir Effect
Ke
Keith & all,
Very interesting but it will take some time for this block-head to absorb the details.
I was hoping you would screed-out the summarized version for us. One reason this is
interesting is in the current context of ongoing threads on vortex and particularly
this little mini-essay belo
At 12:04 am 25-08-04 -0400, you wrote:
>With all the recent discussion by our local cement-heads (grin)
Now that's an interesting difference between England and America.
What you call a cement mixer we call a concrete mixer, so to use
the domometric term, concrete-heads would be more appropriate.
7 matches
Mail list logo
