No wonder people despair -- when they don't just smirk, knowingly -- at the
world of Over-Unity research.
I have also long-time despaired at the general political naivete exhibited
in fora like vortex-L. Engineering and physics knowledge is not nearly
enough to see these sorts of efforts through t
: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Copy of Rossi's civil complaint
That is a very straight legal case Rossi reveals that points to the failure of
IH to honor its contract. Rossi is clearly going to win this unless IH pays up
the $89 million. Rossi is in the catbird seat as he is
Wow! I would hope Rossi’s lawyer has actual evidence for these claims, if so
Rossi may be short cutting their play and force an amicable settlement in
everyone’s best interest.
[snip]Among other things, DARDEN, VAUGHN, IH and IPH have (a) disclosed the ECat
IP to LEONARDO's competitors; (b) att
"I think that Rossi feels that he has been deeply wronged in the past and
for some reason I.H. is/was trying to string him along on the payment of
the 89 million dollars owed him and he wasn't going to wait for any excuses
and filed as soon as he felt he might never see the money/profit he feels
he
I think that Rossi feels that he has been deeply
wronged in the past and for some reason I.H.
is/was trying to string him along on the payment
of the 89 million dollars owed him and he wasn't
going to wait for any excuses and filed as soon
as he felt he might never see the money/profit he
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> Obviously, this all gets down to the data, in the end. Are there 2000
>> hours of reliable data for power out vs. power in ? If so, then this will
>> probably never go to trial – the Court wi
Well, I was coming from the strong expectation that the report wasn't going
to show anything at all.
Though - from the perspective of the damage this can do to LENR in
general ,yeah, this could be very bad.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Blaze
Russ George wrote:
> It’s ridiculous to suggest that the people who wrote that very clean and
> clear set of legal claims are fools, that they don’t know the ropes, and
> have not done their homework with the data with competent help.
>
Regarding the technical claims, they could well be wrong.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:26 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
Obviously, this all gets down to the data, in the end. Are there 2000 hours
> of reliable data for power out vs. power in ? If so, then this will
> probably never go to trial – the Court will appoint an expert and the
> verdict will be directed b
10) If there is solid data over thousands of hours which backs Rossi’s
and Penon’s claim and the COP is much less – say 1.5 then it will be
a tough call but Rossi could win.
I got the sense that 6x COP was required for the payout
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Blaze Spinnaker
wrote:
I am actually hopeful. 50x is pretty high. It was installed in a customer
> site. That's some crazy attempt at fraud.
I have a bad feeling about the lawsuit. It does not make me any more
confident in Rossi's account. But I agree that
From: Jed Rothwell
http://www.e-catworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Leonardosuit01-main.pdf
As a general rule in Lawsuits, when the answer to a particular complaint
arrives, the reader will be shocked that the two parties are talking about the
same set of facts. The next round of this tra
/
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 5:57 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of Rossi's civil complaint
Russ George mailto:russ.geo...@gmail.com> > wrote:
That is a very straight legal case Rossi reveals that po
More here:
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/
anyways, let's wait for the rebuttal.
there are a lot missing exhibits in the filing, like the ERV report,
Darden's agreement to commence the test, etc.
Maybe the ERV report will 'leak out' and experts will be able to poke holes
for Darden.
Here are some more court papers:
http://www.sifferkoll.se/sifferkoll/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Rossi_et_al_v_Darden_et_al__flsdce-16-21199__0001.2.pdf
I am actually hopeful. 50x is pretty high. It was installed in a customer
site. That's some crazy attempt at fraud.
Maybe 71 is stated wrong, and it only surged to 50x.But if not, 50x
over the lifetime.. that's impressive an Rossi should get his due.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016, Jed Rothw
Russ George wrote:
That is a very straight legal case Rossi reveals that points to the failure
> of IH to honor its contract. Rossi is clearly going to win this unless IH
> pays up the $89 million.
>
Only if: 1. Rossi has not misrepresented the contracts; and 2. Penon's
report has merit. I know
lol.
On Wednesday, April 6, 2016, Russ George wrote:
> That is a very straight legal case Rossi reveals that points to the
> failure of IH to honor its contract. Rossi is clearly going to win this
> unless IH pays up the $89 million. Rossi is in the catbird seat as he is
> being seen to enforce
That is a very straight legal case Rossi reveals that points to the failure of
IH to honor its contract. Rossi is clearly going to win this unless IH pays up
the $89 million. Rossi is in the catbird seat as he is being seen to enforce
his IP and license agreements which is a vital task under IP
20 matches
Mail list logo