thank you, dear Ron, but I am only sometimes correct
Peter
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Ron Kita wrote:
> Greetings Vortex,
>
> In Dr Peter Gluck s post citing LENR, Peter is correct as usual.
>
> I should mention that in the book: A Machine Called Indomibable- The
> History of the MRI:
>
>
As someone suggested, "quantum reactor" or "quantum fusion reactor"
would work better.
T
Terry, the ways of bureaucracy are tortuous, I have met seen lots of
quantum reactors.They were mainly "perpetuum stabile" ypu know the
antonu=ym of Perpettuum mobile.
Peter
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> As someone suggested, "quantum reactor" or "quantum fusion reactor
I prefer Quantum Singularity Reactor...
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
> As someone suggested, "quantum reactor" or "quantum fusion reactor"
> would work better.
>
> T
>
>
singularity is frightening
peter
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Chemical Engineer wrote:
> I prefer Quantum Singularity Reactor...
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
>
>> As someone suggested, "quantum reactor" or "quantum fusion reactor"
>> would work better.
>>
>> T
>>
Peter,
I do not believe at this time there is any chance of collapse of a
significant amount of matter from one of these things. Unless you give
birth to an enormously large gremlin to begin with, they like to reach
thermal equilibrium with their surroundings extremely quickly.
There is however a
to think affairs to their end.
Guenter
Von: Peter Gluck
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Gesendet: 20:50 Dienstag, 14.August 2012
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:LENR - MRI versus NMR- Peter Gluck=OKK
singularity is frightening
peter
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:49 PM, Chemical Engineer wrot
7 matches
Mail list logo
