Re: W.: Aw: Re: [Vo]:prediction for the Oct 6 Fat Cat demo

2011-10-06 Thread Jed Rothwell
Someone wrote: > In previous experiments, however hidden energysources such as fuel > > tanks were not excluded. That is incorrect. A video of a previous test shows the observers lifting up the device, looking under it, and placing it on a weight scale. They also looked inside it. Hidden energy

Re: W.: Aw: Re: [Vo]:prediction for the Oct 6 Fat Cat demo

2011-10-06 Thread mixent
In reply to peter.heck...@arcor.de's message of Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:04:06 +0200 (CEST): Hi, [snip] >I dont see this as a problem. It would be very fine if there is /repeatable/ >evidence for anomalous heat. >If there is enough excess heat that cannot be explained conventionally then >this is a de

W.: Aw: Re: [Vo]:prediction for the Oct 6 Fat Cat demo

2011-10-06 Thread peter . heckert
- Original Nachricht Von: Jouni Valkonen An: Peter Heckert Datum: 06.10.2011 04:15 Betreff: Re: [Vo]:prediction for the Oct 6 Fat Cat demo > It is not about evidence of cold fusion. There are plenty of evidence > for anomalous excess heat. Problem is that there is 10^10

W.: Aw: Re: [Vo]:prediction for the Oct 6 Fat Cat demo

2011-10-06 Thread peter . heckert
- Original Nachricht Von: peter.heck...@arcor.de An: jounivalko...@gmail.com Datum: 06.10.2011 08:48 Betreff: Aw: Re: [Vo]:prediction for the Oct 6 Fat Cat demo Yes without doubt this would be discovered sooner or later. It was my thought, that nobody had the idea to test t