Someone wrote:
> In previous experiments, however hidden energysources such as fuel
> > tanks were not excluded.
That is incorrect. A video of a previous test shows the observers lifting up
the device, looking under it, and placing it on a weight scale. They also
looked inside it. Hidden energy
In reply to peter.heck...@arcor.de's message of Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:04:06 +0200
(CEST):
Hi,
[snip]
>I dont see this as a problem. It would be very fine if there is /repeatable/
>evidence for anomalous heat.
>If there is enough excess heat that cannot be explained conventionally then
>this is a de
- Original Nachricht
Von: Jouni Valkonen
An: Peter Heckert
Datum: 06.10.2011 04:15
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:prediction for the Oct 6 Fat Cat demo
> It is not about evidence of cold fusion. There are plenty of evidence
> for anomalous excess heat. Problem is that there is 10^10
- Original Nachricht
Von: peter.heck...@arcor.de
An: jounivalko...@gmail.com
Datum: 06.10.2011 08:48
Betreff: Aw: Re: [Vo]:prediction for the Oct 6 Fat Cat demo
Yes without doubt this would be discovered sooner or later.
It was my thought, that nobody had the idea to test t
4 matches
Mail list logo