In reply to peter.heck...@arcor.de's message of Thu, 6 Oct 2011 10:04:06 +0200 (CEST): Hi, [snip] >I dont see this as a problem. It would be very fine if there is /repeatable/ >evidence for anomalous heat. >If there is enough excess heat that cannot be explained conventionally then >this is a definitive proof of nuclear reactions. No, it could be evidence of super-chemistry, i.e. shrunken Hydrogen that is not necessarily followed by a nuclear reaction. Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
