Duplication of my US Patent that you asked for is right here http://biz.yahoo.com/ccn/050516/21a58906579d6465ecba4d32a91a3c30.html?.v=2
Just because people would rather first ridicule the idea and then steal it does not make me paranoid Jones - but it has made me more critical of the so called
Jones,
You accuse me of detracting and bringing scientific disrespect to the topic of ZPE and LENR.
I missed what you said on 6/25/02 "Hal stated clearly that he saw it" which is exactly opposite of the paraphrased "Hal told me he missed meeting Chernetski but got the papers." as he told both
thomas malloy wrote:
I wrote;
And Ed Storms responded;
Well Thomas, I give hot fusion a 0 chance for success for the
following reasons:
I was giving the designers the benefit of the doubt when I gave them a
5% chance of success. Perhaps they have come up with some new wrinkle
that you
At 11:08 am 27/06/2005 -0600, Ed wrote:
Let's be realistic, Thomas. At one time the Japanese, the Germans, and
even the British wanted to conquer us.
And I thought it was the British colonists who rebelled and declared
UDI a la Smith in Southern Rhodesia. Just as well whites were in the
I was thinking of the war of 1812, Frank. Of course, burning Washington
would not equal conquering, at least then.
Ed
Grimer wrote:
At 11:08 am 27/06/2005 -0600, Ed wrote:
Let's be realistic, Thomas. At one time the Japanese, the Germans, and
even the British wanted to conquer us.
--- Christopher Arnold wrote:
you sound upset with me for some reason.
Chris,
This is not personal - this is about a prevalent
attitude which unfortunatley exists throughout this
general field of inquiry, LENR - which field has
enough problems of credibility without adding another
issue which
thomas malloy wrote:
And Jed Rothwell replied'
Good at what? attracting funding? The last I heard, the last
generation of Takamak's were producing .85 units of usable energy
for each one input. This is a deal that only a bureaucrat, or an
idiot liberal could love.
Why do you ascribe
From: Christopher
Richard Hall knows what happened at ITT and he also said he knows about an
event that occurred with the fusor that had to be kept secret. Maybe
someone would like to ask him about that? While you are at it - say hello for
me.
Which Richard Hall? Formerly of the NSA?
From: Terry Blanton
From: Christopher
Richard Hall knows what happened at ITT and he also
said he knows about an event that occurred with the
fusor that had to be kept secret. Maybe someone would
like to ask him about that? While you are at it - say
hello for me.
Which Richard
Terry..
What supposedly happened at ITT, my early years employer ?
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Terry Blanton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2005 7:58 AM
Subject: Re: proposed fusion reactor
From: Christopher
Richard Hall knows what happened
Well Thomas, I give hot fusion a 0 chance for success for the
following reasons:
1. 40 years and about 30 billion dollars have been required to get to
about 0.85 energy amplification for a few seconds. To be practical, an
energy amplification of at least 1000 for years will be needed. Better
Richard Hall knows what happened at ITT and he also said he knows
about an event that occurred with the fusor that had to be kept
secret.
Like the Puthoff/Chernitskii false information, this is another
very confused and inaccurate conclusion. There was no cover-up, no
conspiracy and no
From: RC Macaulay
Terry..
What supposedly happened at ITT, my early years employer ?
That was Chris Arnold's message. Allegedly an event from a Farnsworth Fusor.
Hello Ed and fellow Vortexians,
I might call to your attention an analysis I created titled Comparison of
Hot and Cold Fusion, presented at the March, 2005 APS meeting.
It is slide #16 in this document:
http://newenergytimes.com/Library/2005KrivitS-AJournalisticInvestigation.pdf .
If anyone
Jones, you sound upset with me for some reason.
My apologies to Richard HULL formisspelling his last name - I am getting old.
So, if you still think Hal did not see the Chernetski device - it must meanyou never did look at the Hal Puthoff video where he said he did. Now I understand. Hal
From: Christopher Arnold
Farnsworths Fusor never produced Fusion, now that's news to me as well.
This is one experiment that did not suffer the Little Effect:
http://earthtech.org/experiments/fusor/bigsys3.html
Little/Puthoff's replication of the Fusor.
I was surfing and came across this link. These people are building a
new Tokamak. Well, hope springs eternal.
http://www.iter.org/index.htm
Tokamak has proven itself to be a winner, because for some reason it always gets funding.thomas malloy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was surfing and came across this link. These people are building a new Tokamak. Well, hope springs eternal.http://www.iter.org/index.htm
Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take
Title: Re: proposed fusion reactor
I posted, and Chris Arnold replied
Tokamak has proven itself to be a winner,
because for some reason it always gets funding.
Good at what? attracting funding? The last I heard, the last
generation of Takamak's were producing .85 units of usable energy
thomas malloy wrote:
Good at what? attracting funding? The last I heard, the last generation of
Takamak's were producing .85 units of usable energy for each one input.
This is a deal that only a bureaucrat, or an idiot liberal could love.
Why do you ascribe this trait to liberals? Both
20 matches
Mail list logo
