Re: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular.

2005-12-13 Thread Peter Amstutz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Reed Hedges wrote: Yeah, it's bad, I guess. It's Infoworld. They link to less bad stuff though somewhere in there. After I posted this I tried to find information about how the survey was actually conducted and couldn't, so I

Re: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular.

2005-12-13 Thread Reed Hedges
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Amstutz wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, Reed Hedges wrote: > >>> >>> This article is about a survey of programming languages. Despite it's >>> repeated use of terms like "managed code" and "enterprise" and claim >>> that C# is the big winner, the

Re: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular.

2005-12-12 Thread Peter Amstutz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 11 Dec 2005, Reed Hedges wrote: This article is about a survey of programming languages. Despite it's repeated use of terms like "managed code" and "enterprise" and claim that C# is the big winner, the survey shows that interpreted langu

Re: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular.

2005-12-12 Thread Neil Mosafi
of any virus how so ever generated.  Thank you.       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Neil MosafiSent: Tuesday, 13 December 2005 11:21To: VOS DiscussionSubject: Re: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular.   Nope, well not AFAIK anyway unl

RE: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular.

2005-12-12 Thread Nick Bronson
.       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Neil MosafiSent: Tuesday, 13 December 2005 11:21To: VOS DiscussionSubject: Re: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular. Nope, well not AFAIK anyway unless ms have changed something in .NET2. ASPX pages

Re: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular.

2005-12-12 Thread Neil Mosafi
Nope, well not AFAIK anyway unless ms have changed something in .NET2. ASPX pages are actually compiled on the fly when you first browse to the page. Makes for faster rendering I guess?  On 12/13/05, Reed Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Dec 12, 2005, at 6:50 PM, Neil Mosafi wrote:> _javascript

Re: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular.

2005-12-12 Thread Reed Hedges
On Dec 12, 2005, at 6:50 PM, Neil Mosafi wrote: JavaScript is a client side language. ASP sites would generally be written in VBScript for the server side code, and ASP.NET in either C# or VB.NET, both of which are compiled. Can you run VB.NET interpreted as well? _

Re: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular.

2005-12-12 Thread Neil Mosafi
unday, December 11, 2005 5:02 PM > Subject: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular.>>> This article is about a survey of programming languages.> Despite it's repeated use of terms like "managed code" and > "enterprise" and claim tha

RE: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular.

2005-12-12 Thread Brian
> -Original Message- > From: Reed Hedge > Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2005 5:02 PM > Subject: [vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular. > > > This article is about a survey of programming languages. > Despite it's repeated use of

[vos-d] Dynamic interpreted languages getting more popular.

2005-12-11 Thread Reed Hedges
This article is about a survey of programming languages. Despite it's repeated use of terms like "managed code" and "enterprise" and claim that C# is the big winner, the survey shows that interpreted languages like Python, Ruby, etc. plus "scripting languages" (into which they lump Perl, PHP