Re: [vos-d] Re: Re: next priorities; mySQL

2006-04-17 Thread Peter Amstutz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Lalo Martins wrote: I know MySQL is now a complete proper database system, with ACID and all. But up to just a few months ago, it was just a place to dump your data that happened to (mostly) respond to SQL queries. It gained so

Re: [vos-d] Re: Re: next priorities; mySQL

2006-04-11 Thread Neil Mosafi
You know it's spelt Persistence and not Persistance? ;)On 11/04/06, Reed Hedges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-Hash: SHA1Neil Mosafi wrote:> Surely the best approach is trying to support as many different database > servers as possible, rather than pushing a single one

Re: [vos-d] Re: Re: next priorities; mySQL

2006-04-10 Thread Reed Hedges
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Mosafi wrote: > Surely the best approach is trying to support as many different database > servers as possible, rather than pushing a single one onto the VOS user? > > To that extent, does anyone know of a flexible C++ data access library which >

Re: [vos-d] Re: Re: next priorities; mySQL

2006-04-10 Thread Reed Hedges
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fair enough criticism I guess; you're passionate about it though! The mysql interface code (mysqldb.cc, mysqldb.hh) is about 65 lines, so go for it if you want something better :) The interface class to subclass is in sqldb.hh. (I'll also add it

Re: [vos-d] Re: Re: next priorities; mySQL

2006-04-10 Thread Neil Mosafi
Surely the best approach is trying to support as many different database servers as possible, rather than pushing a single one onto the VOS user?To that extent, does anyone know of a flexible C++ data access library which can be configured to talk to many different databases?  I am talking not only

[vos-d] Re: Re: next priorities; mySQL

2006-04-10 Thread Lalo Martins
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 18:55:29 -0400, Reed Hedges wrote: >> my personal goal for .24 would be refurbishing the sqlpersist machinery. I >> just don't trust mysql at all ;-) > > What do you mean, you don't trust it? > > What about PostgreSQL then? I know MySQL is now a complete proper database syst