I've been getting email viruses coming from a machine on the UC Davis
network. (The return addresses are faked, but the received header
exposes the IP of the underlying machine.)
The IP is 169.237.101.73, which doesn't have a reverse DNS binding, but
belongs to the UCD netblock.
I figure
På onsdag, 11 februari 2004, skrev Bill Kendrick:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 03:58:38PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
i'm teaching a few classes and keep my scores/averages in gnumeric
spreadsheet (which i can convert to openoffice of course). i want to
have some kind of site where my
On Wednesday, Feb 11, 2004, at 09:15 US/Pacific, Gabriel Rosa wrote:
I wouldn't say that's the only way you could be getting targeted. My
mail
server at home has been getting dictionaried lately.
With such a short username, it's entirely possible that someone just
guessed
your username at
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:12:23AM -0800, Mitch Patenaude wrote:
On Wednesday, Feb 11, 2004, at 09:15 US/Pacific, Gabriel Rosa wrote:
I wouldn't say that's the only way you could be getting targeted. My
mail
server at home has been getting dictionaried lately.
With such a short username,
Cool, print range did the trick. I had to do some math and a little tiral
and error to get the various sizes working, but this is what I ended up
with if anybody cares: http://gaia.ecs.csus.edu/~margolid/gp/
Thanks to all who offered a tip. I now have cheap/easy graphpaper.
Dave
On Tue, 10
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:15:03PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Tue 10 Feb 04, 6:40 PM, Bill Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 03:58:38PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
i'm teaching a few classes and keep my scores/averages in gnumeric
spreadsheet (which i
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 09:15:00AM -0800, Gabriel Rosa wrote:
With such a short username, it's entirely possible that someone just guessed
your username at sonic.
I've been getting a lot of virus bounces thanks to someone named
[EMAIL PROTECTED]. That's my domain. There's no such user.
So
On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 13:04, Bill Kendrick wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:15:03PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
On Tue 10 Feb 04, 6:40 PM, Bill Kendrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 03:58:38PM -0800, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
snip
Have you considered using a
