On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 05:43:06PM -0700, Rod Roark wrote:
Speaking of wireless networking - what kind of range are
people getting within a house or office building? I
understand line-of-sight is important, and obviously you
won't have that between different rooms.
Inside something like a
Rod Roark wrote:
Speaking of wireless networking - what kind of range are
people getting within a house or office building? I
understand line-of-sight is important, and obviously you
won't have that between different rooms.
Also, any comments on using 802.11 in a hospital? I know
many hospitals
Rod Roark wrote:
Speaking of wireless networking - what kind of range are
people getting within a house or office building? I
understand line-of-sight is important, and obviously you
won't have that between different rooms.
I have the home portal wireless router through SBC Yahoo! DSL. A
Oops. Clicked send instead of postpone. Meant to also include this:
What about use of a Yagi vs OmniDirectional antenna and distance?
ME said:
Aha! No longer a lurker! :-)
Nice to see you on the list.
boombox said:
Cell phones use the 1.9 GHz and 3 GHz band where wireless networks use
2.4
Quoting William Perdue ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Another question: How well does Fedora handle Apache?
Fedora furnishes the same multithreading-friendly Apache 2.x series
that Red Hat standardised on, a couple of versions ago. (Most other
distributions are sticking with the 1.3.x series, for
Quoting Brian Lavender ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I am doing a talk on integrating SpamAssassin at the SMTP layer. The
implementation is SA-Exim. http://www.saclug.org/
Hi, Brian! Man, I want to drive up and hear that. In case it helps,
here's something that works beautifully with Exim4 and
Oops. Clicked send instead of postpone. Meant to also include this:
What about use of a Yagi vs OmniDirectional antenna and distance?
ME said:
Aha! No longer a lurker! :-)
Nice to see you on the list.
Thank you for the welcome :)
I have been using yagi and omni directional antennas for
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 04:19:03AM -0700, Rod Roark wrote:
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 12:06 am, Brian Lavender wrote:
On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:15:18PM -0700, Rod Roark wrote:
Seems like most of the spam that I (and thus LUGOD) are not
successfully filtering out these days is from dynamic
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 11:27:57AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting Brian Lavender ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I am doing a talk on integrating SpamAssassin at the SMTP layer. The
implementation is SA-Exim. http://www.saclug.org/
Hi, Brian! Man, I want to drive up and hear that. In case it
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 12:09 pm, Brian Lavender wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 04:19:03AM -0700, Rod Roark wrote:
...
Well I use Postfix. I believe the rough equivalent with
that would be something like amavisd-new which runs
SpamAssassin internally, using the before queue content
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 12:45:13PM -0700, Rod Roark wrote:
On Tuesday 22 June 2004 12:09 pm, Brian Lavender wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2004 at 04:19:03AM -0700, Rod Roark wrote:
...
Well I use Postfix. I believe the rough equivalent with
that would be something like amavisd-new which runs
Quoting Brian Lavender ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Everything was getting flagged by dorkslayers by SA 2.55. I think 2.63
is doing a better job. Did the dorkslayers list just turn the on flag
on, or has it been deprecated?
ORBS was shut down, a few years ago. If people do nothing else with
ancient
Rick Moen wrote:
ORBS was shut down, a few years ago. If people do nothing else with
ancient version of SA they choose to run, they should update
/usr/share/spamassassin/20_head_tests.cf and
/usr/share/spamassassin/20_dnsbl_tests.cf to comment out references to
obsolete or non-functional DNSBLs.
13 matches
Mail list logo
