Richard Crawford wrote:
On Saturday 25 February 2006 10:55, Alex Mandel wrote:
I've had the same problem with Norton Anit-virus scans. I want it to
scan when I'm not at work but that means I have to lock my station, if
I log out it won't run until I log back in. Utterly useless.
My best g
On Saturday 25 February 2006 10:55, Alex Mandel wrote:
> I've had the same problem with Norton Anit-virus scans. I want it to
> scan when I'm not at work but that means I have to lock my station, if
> I log out it won't run until I log back in. Utterly useless.
> My best guess is that these softw
Hey Z:
I think what you're looking for is the UserDir directive.
Is that enabled in the conf file (for your target user at least)?
Check this out for more info:
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.0/mod/mod_userdir.html
--HTHO
jan
--- Cylar Z <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Thanks to
Sorry for the dupe.
--j
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><
I believe that unarmed truth and unconditional love will have the final word in
reality. That is why right, temporarily defeated, is stronger than evil
triumphant.
Martin Luther King Jr., Accepting N
Bill Kendrick wrote:
Off-topic, but I've got a question:
I have McAfee security crap on my Windows XP laptop here at work.
(It includes a firewall which occasionally refuses to run due to
"Unknown error"; but seems to start working again after some random
self-update by McAfee, or some random W
Mark K. Kim wrote:
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 05:29:05PM -0800, jim stockford wrote:
how about something like this:
[snip]
cd
cp -R *
sleep 1
rm -Rf *
sleep 1
cp -R /* .
You're gonna lose the "System" file attribute if you do this from Linux
on a FAT partition. This is crit
On 2/25/06, Cylar Z <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> [...]
>
> Now I have a completely unrelated question about
> Apache HTTP server, one that I couldn't find the
> answer to at the Apache Server Project's website. The
> Linux server I'm working on runs HTTP server 2.0.
>
> A user on the s
Hey all,
Thanks to all who wrote regarding my "linux and
viruses" thread. A nod to those who said my admin was
unbelievably naive and uninformed. You know, he always
seemed like a smart guy, but the fact that he's barely
even heard of Linux (yet is in charge of a 200-client
network) is staggering.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 10:07:52PM -0800, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
> Compared to an actual defrag, this operation is
> risky. A power interruption could disrupt the process
> at an unpredictable state. If performed as an incremental
> backup (multiple prior savepoints) and restore it could be effect
