On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> it would be a bit more convenient to do it with opera, however. opera has a
> pretty advanced cookie system right now with all the features you'd expect
> like blocking/allowing cookies on a per-site basis. and lots more.
>
Mozilla also has a pre
i'm trying to decide whether i want junkbuster to manage cookies. the
mechanism is by far more configurable than anything i've ever seen. i like
the idea of feeding cookies that say "leave me the PHRACK alone" back to the
servers that send cookies.
it would be a bit more convenient to do it wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You know how to tell it not to block cookies? I prefer to let konqueror take
care of that.
On Friday, December 14 2001 01:12 pm, Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
> begin p
>
> > i just installed junkbuster for the first time. all i can say is...
> > whoa.
begin p
> i just installed junkbuster for the first time. all i can say is... whoa.
>
> my only complaint is that browsing seem to be perceptively slower. not
> enough to stop using junkbuster, but it's a bit noticeable. it's nice that
> junkbuster seems to read the blockfile dynamically, bu
