Re: [vox-tech] Training spamassassin's bayenessian filter

2003-11-06 Thread Ryan Castellucci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 06 November 2003 10:34 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu 06 Nov 03, 10:17 AM, Ryan Castellucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > The other neat thing spam assassin can do, with bayesian filtering, is >

Re: [vox-tech] Training spamassassin's bayenessian filter

2003-11-06 Thread p
On Thu 06 Nov 03, 10:17 AM, Ryan Castellucci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 06 November 2003 08:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Thu 06 Nov 03, 8:29 AM, R. Douglas Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 0

Re: [vox-tech] Training spamassassin's bayenessian filter

2003-11-06 Thread Ryan Castellucci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 06 November 2003 08:58 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thu 06 Nov 03, 8:29 AM, R. Douglas Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:59:12PM -0800, Ryan Castellucci wrote: > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >

Re: [vox-tech] Training spamassassin's bayenessian filter

2003-11-06 Thread p
On Thu 06 Nov 03, 8:29 AM, R. Douglas Barbieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:59:12PM -0800, Ryan Castellucci wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Wednesday 05 November 2003 09:24 pm, Ken Bloom wrote: > > > Will SpamAssassin's bayenessian

Re: [vox-tech] Training spamassassin's bayenessian filter

2003-11-06 Thread R. Douglas Barbieri
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 09:59:12PM -0800, Ryan Castellucci wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 05 November 2003 09:24 pm, Ken Bloom wrote: > > Will SpamAssassin's bayenessian be more effective if I train it on > > every message that comes through (even ones th

Re: [vox-tech] Training spamassassin's bayenessian filter

2003-11-05 Thread Ryan Castellucci
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 05 November 2003 09:24 pm, Ken Bloom wrote: > Will SpamAssassin's bayenessian be more effective if I train it on > every message that comes through (even ones that it's built in tests > have already rejected as spam) or only on false negat