[vpp-dev] make-plugin.sh is missing configure.ac and Makefile.am? (resend with plain text)

2017-01-03 Thread Lu, Patrick
Dear developers, Sorry for the previous email encoding error. I'm trying to create a new plugin using the make-plugin.sh from build-root/emacs-lisp. While the script generated most of the source files, it's missing configure.ac and Makefile.am, so I could not proceed with autoreconf -i -f. How

[vpp-dev] make-plugin.sh is missing configure.ac and Makefile.am?

2017-01-03 Thread Lu, Patrick
??**???*???

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp make test for verify - are we there yet ? [awoken]

2017-01-03 Thread Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)
// Typed this email before the live discussion on vpp call just now - still sending it out :) Hello, After the previous ver of this thread went into a frenzy of emails and fixes in vpp make test code, I wanted to re-check the situation. And as it is a New Year, I’m not lazy anymore, and did run

[vpp-dev] gerrit.fd.io acting up...

2017-01-03 Thread Dave Barach (dbarach)
Folks, Gerrit.fd.io is behaving badly this morning: glacially slow, gateway timeouts, disappearance of the +2 button for committers, etc. We've alerted the LF. No ETA for happy camping. Thanks... Dave ___ vpp-dev mailing list vpp-dev@lists.fd.io http

Re: [vpp-dev] L2 XConnect over MPLS?

2017-01-03 Thread Neale Ranns (nranns)
Hi nagp, It’s not currently possible but it is achievable with a small amount of effort. The encap side I think Is already possible. As you say, use l2-xcrw and xconnect the l2 sub-interface with an ‘mpls tunnel …’ interface. The MPLS tunnel will add the label stack of your choice and then rout

[vpp-dev] L2 XConnect over MPLS?

2017-01-03 Thread Nagaprabhanjan Bellaru
Hi, Is it possible to do L2 cross-connect over MPLS? For example: I want traffic coming in on a L2 sub interface to get punted on a MPLS tunnel (i.e. with MPLS encapsulation) and on the other side, pop the labels and switch the packet on the corresponding sub interface. Technically, a psuedowire

Re: [vpp-dev] admin_up_down flag for loopback interface

2017-01-03 Thread Neale Ranns (nranns)
Hi Matej, Then you should remove the address from the interface – that in turn will remove the route from the FIB – and is in the only way that that route can be removed from the FIB. Regards, neale On 02/01/2017, 15:29, "Matej Klotton -X (mklotton - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)" wrote:

Re: [vpp-dev] strange phenomenon of interface

2017-01-03 Thread Neale Ranns (nranns)
Hi Ewan, The value 0 represents the always present local0 interface. So this: mp->next_hop_sw_if_index = ntohl (0); should be: mp->next_hop_sw_if_index = ntohl (~0); in order to specify that no interface is desried. I would also suggest; sh ip fib To give you more information about the p

Re: [vpp-dev] strange phenomenon of interface

2017-01-03 Thread yug...@telincn.com
We did refer to the "api_ip_add_del_route" and test_client.c, but it seems that the route result still is not wright. test_client.c, add_del_ip4_route (test_main_t * tm, int enable_disable) { vl_api_ip_add_del_route_t *mp; u32 tmp; mp = vl_msg_api_alloc (sizeof (*mp)); memset (mp, 0, si