Hi Sergio,
I upgrading to Ubuntu 16.04,
Succedd to Nativly build fd.io_odp4vpp (w / odp-linux),
However when buidl fd.io_vpp (w/ dpdk), it reported below error,
(almost the same , only difference is over dpdk or odp-linux)
Anyone met before? Seem a bug of gcc.
In file included from
/
HI Brian,
Yes, I upgrading to Ubuntu 16.04,
Succedd to Nativly build fd.io_odp4vpp (w / odp-linux),
However when buidl fd.io_vpp (w/ dpdk), it reported below error,
Anyone met before? Seem a bug of gcc.
In file included from
/home/ericxh/work/git_work/fd.io_vpp/build-data/../src/vlib/error
Hi, Andrew and Pan,
I came across the thread you are talking about improvements of ACL plugin. Any
update? I am also interested in the performance of ACL, wondering what is the
direction of the optimizations you are working on. Could you share?
Thanks
Yipeng
>On 5/23/17, 张攀 yunshan.net.cn<
Dave,
Oh, I think during the "release" time we did the opposite. I was basing the
logic on the sensible origin of the work on the code: the issue found on
stable/1707, so I first verify the fix with the finder in their lab, thus
ensuring they test just that change, and then commit and then cher
Hi Eric,
On 08/23 06:23:07, Eric Chen wrote:
> Hi Brian,
>
> I am trying to natively build vpp in aarch64 box as well,
>
> However when I "make install-dep", it report error -- "unable to locate
> package default-jdk-headless",
>
> If you are using Ubuntu as well, could you share with me your
vpp-dev, Florin,
Below is an analysis of the all of the failures that this patch
encountered before finally passing. None of the failures were related in
any way to the code changes in the patch.
In summary, there appear to be a number of different factors involved
with these failures.
*
Tom, let me know when they are verified and I will merge them….
Thanks,
Damjan
On 25 Aug 2017, at 18:16, Thomas F Herbert
mailto:therb...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Ignore previous message for now. I have to re-base the patch.
On 08/25/2017 11:53 AM, Thomas F Herbert wrote:
All,
Could someone ple
Ignore previous message for now. I have to re-base the patch.
On 08/25/2017 11:53 AM, Thomas F Herbert wrote:
All,
Could someone please review the patch below? Probably the gerrit
emails are buried in various inboxes.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8117/
Thanks,
--TFH
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
N
It appears build times have recovered. I opened a ticket with the vendor to
determine the root cause of the timeouts and will update the ticket when I
receive a response.
Thank you,
Vanessa
On Thu Aug 24 13:57:31 2017, dwallacelf wrote:
> Dear helpdesk,
>
> Please investigate this build failu
All,
Could someone please review the patch below? Probably the gerrit emails
are buried in various inboxes.
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8117/
Thanks,
--TFH
--
*Thomas F Herbert*
NFV and Fast Data Planes
Office of Technology
*Red Hat*
___
vpp-dev mai
Actually, vnet.am looks fucked up, too -- the conditional covers only part
of ipsec -- really fucked up!
Burt
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Burt Silverman wrote:
> Looks to me like a bug involving conditional compilation -- the vnet.am
> has the ipsec.api.h file generated only when WITH_LIBS
Looks to me like a bug involving conditional compilation -- the vnet.am has
the ipsec.api.h file generated only when WITH_LIBSSL is true, but
vnet_all_api_h.h has ipsec.api.h included unconditionally. I recall Eric
you were doing something recently with WITH_LIBSSL turned off/0'd. Maybe
something l
HI Sergio
Thanks a lot.
I look at the log, and search “APIGEN: “, indeed not find “ipsec.api.h” is
generated.
So I change the .mk, try to remove “ --without-libssl”,
Then “ipsec.api.h” is generated, but I do not understand why
“--without-libssl” can not work, there should be some dependenc
Andrew,
IMHO, best practice is to always commit to master first, then cherry
pick to stable branches as required. That being said, I'm not sure if
this has been explicitly agreed upon by the VPP community.
Thanks,
-daw-
On 8/25/17 3:38 AM, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
Dave,
Yeah, those thing
Hi Eric,
The ipsec.api.h file should be auto generated, did you have any other
error before that one?
Thanks,
Sergio
On 25/08/2017 12:03, Eric Chen wrote:
Hi
I am building fd.io w/ dpdk natively on an am64 box, however
encounters below error,
I didn’t find ipsec.api.h under the package
Read through this thread:
https://lists.fd.io/pipermail/vpp-dev/2017-June/005586.html
And the user needs to be a member of the 'vpp' group.
Billy
On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Jakub Horn (jakuhorn)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I upgraded to v17.10-rc0~220-g5c04ad0
>
> And I need to run more inst
Hi
I am building fd.io w/ dpdk natively on an am64 box, however encounters below
error,
I didn't find ipsec.api.h under the package,
Shouldn't have such a basic problem, what did I miss?
Could anyone help me out?
CC vnet/policer/xlate.lo
In file included from
/home/ericxh/work/git_wor
Dave,
Yeah, those things are found throughout testing of stable/1707 with various
control planes (openstack etc), so I first deal with them in stable/1707 and
after the commit id is there, cherry pick into master (so i made
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8207/ for master now). Those are few things
18 matches
Mail list logo
