Re: [vpp-dev] inet raw socket

2018-11-06 Thread Ole Troan
> <81.gif>thanks very much! And I have another question: does VPP support INET > RAW socket, I find the UDP and TCP socket except the raw socket. No, but you do get full access to the frame in the buffer. Which is generally a much more flexible interface than INET RAW. Cheers, Ole-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [vpp-dev] Help on VxLAN configuration

2018-11-06 Thread Xuekun
Thanks, it works that putting the loop interface into the separate IP tables! -Original Message- From: John Lo (loj) Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 2:14 AM To: Hu, Xuekun ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: RE: Help on VxLAN configuration One can put the BD BVI interfaces into its own IP

Re: [vpp-dev] Help on VxLAN configuration

2018-11-06 Thread John Lo (loj) via Lists.Fd.Io
One can put the BD BVI interfaces into its own IP table and leave VXLAN encap and underlay in default global IP table. We would put the loopN interface into an IP table before assigning its IP address: vpp# set int ip table ? set interface ip table set interface ip table

Re: [**EXTERNAL**] [vpp-dev] TAP v1/v2 API questions

2018-11-06 Thread Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io
> On 6 Nov 2018, at 18:19, Coulson, Ken wrote: > > I didn’t hear anything back on questions below so re-posting again for > another attempt at answers. > > Ken Coulson > > > > From: mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> on behalf of > "Coulson, Ken" mailto:kcoul...@ciena.com>> > Date: Wednesda

Re: [**EXTERNAL**] [vpp-dev] TAP v1/v2 API questions

2018-11-06 Thread Coulson, Ken
I didn’t hear anything back on questions below so re-posting again for another attempt at answers. Ken Coulson From: on behalf of "Coulson, Ken" Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 at 11:10 AM To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: [**EXTERNAL**] [vpp-dev] TAP v1/v2 API questions Per emails on t

Re: [vpp-dev] About memory debug

2018-11-06 Thread Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io
Sure: go look at .../src/vppinfra/{dlmalloc.[ch], mheap.[ch]} From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of tianye@sina Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 9:23 PM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] About memory debug So, everybody here debug the memory issue only with code review? :) That does

Re: [vpp-dev] About Strongswan on VPP

2018-11-06 Thread Kyle Mestery (kmestery) via Lists.Fd.Io
Hello: I’ve taken on the task of trying to get Matus’s patches upstream into StrongSwan as part of some work I’m doing. The start of that was porting them forward to the latest master StrongSwan, as well as VPP 18.10 and VPP master. That work is in this branch here [1]. I have not yet posted th

Re: [vpp-dev] About memory debug

2018-11-06 Thread Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io
> On 6 Nov 2018, at 03:23, tianye@sina wrote: > > So, everybody here debug the memory issue only with code review? J > That does not make sense, right? > so would you please share something for me? I typically use gdb... -- Damjan -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent

[vpp-dev] About Strongswan on VPP

2018-11-06 Thread tianye@sina
Hello Matus and Everyone: I am very glad to know the following project finished the porting effort with Strongswan to VPP. https://github.com/matfabia/strongswan/tree/vpp I think a lot of people will take this project as reference for further development. Can you tell me what is the plan

Re: [vpp-dev] About Strongswan on VPP

2018-11-06 Thread tianye@sina
Hi Matus I will say thank you for your hard work anyway. Besides, can you brief me the TODO list with the current version? If I want to fully enable the functions of Strongswan, What kind of work I need to finalize? From: Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) [mai

Re: [vpp-dev] About memory debug

2018-11-06 Thread tianye@sina
So, everybody here debug the memory issue only with code review? J That does not make sense, right? so would you please share something for me? From: tianye@sina [mailto:tiany...@sina.com] Sent: Monday, November 5, 2018 9:53 AM To: 'vpp-dev@lists.fd.io' Subject: About memory debug He

[vpp-dev] Draft of CSIT-1810 Report

2018-11-06 Thread Tibor Frank via Lists.Fd.Io
Hi The CSIT-1810 Report is being prepared. You can find the draft on: https://docs.fd.io/csit/master/report/ We are continuously adding the data as the test jobs are producing it. Also the chapters "Changes in 1810" and "Known Issues" are still in progress: - VPP Performance: https:/

Re: [E] [vpp-dev] VPPSB Netlink build failing

2018-11-06 Thread Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io
I fully agree on LD_PRELOAD but that should not be the reason for lowering the bar. netling/router plugin is basically abuse of plugin architecture. Plugins are intended to be used for building dataplane nodes, and not control plane agents what effectively that thing is. If somebody wants buil

Re: [vpp-dev] About Strongswan on VPP

2018-11-06 Thread Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) via Lists.Fd.Io
probably some API changes, maybe add NAT traversal support, there are some ugly hacks in code and so on... Matus From: tianye@sina Sent: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 10:38 AM To: Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: RE: About Strongswan on VPP

Re: [E] [vpp-dev] VPPSB Netlink build failing

2018-11-06 Thread Ray Kinsella
I would say that as a community we where advocating LD_PRELOAD'ing TCP shim's for a while - which I would see as being more 10x more invasive than sniffing Netlink messages. :-) My 2c is that we start with sniffing netlink, and then you open the door to the upstream community about native inte

Re: [vpp-dev] About Strongswan on VPP

2018-11-06 Thread Matus Fabian -X (matfabia - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES@Cisco) via Lists.Fd.Io
Hi, Currently I don't have any plan to upstream my strongswan patches. I guess code is little bit outdated now since I tested it with VPP 18.04 and keep in mind that code is PoC quality. There are two plugins for VPP in strongswan kernel_vpp (IPSec and networking backend for VPP) and socket_vpp

[vpp-dev] Help on VxLAN configuration

2018-11-06 Thread Xuekun
Hi, All How to isolate two VxLAN unicast tunnels when L3 routing available? For example, I have two tenants, with different vxlan tunnels connected to the VPP box. Each vxlan tunnel is under a different bridge domain with different loop interface. I need the loop interface to connect to externa