Re: [vpp-dev] QinQ and dot1ad any

2019-12-17 Thread Raj
Thanks a lot for the clarification! Raj On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 7:43 PM John Lo (loj) wrote: > > Hi Raj, > > A sub-interface with "dot1q inner any" can only work with L2 forwarding via > cross-connect or bridging where packets are forwarded using MAC header > without any changes to MAC header

Re: [vpp-dev] merge jobs failing..

2019-12-17 Thread Paul Vinciguerra
Fixed: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/24041 On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 7:00 PM Ed Kern via Lists.Fd.Io wrote: > > Hey benoit, > > Happened to notice (because I was watching the queue anyway since santa > damjan did a bunch of merges) that ubuntu test/merges started failing > after >

[vpp-dev] merge jobs failing..

2019-12-17 Thread Ed Kern via Lists.Fd.Io
Hey benoit, Happened to notice (because I was watching the queue anyway since santa damjan did a bunch of merges) that ubuntu test/merges started failing after https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/23913 No its not clear to me why it verified… it looks like a simple typo where you meant to do from

Re: [vpp-dev] QinQ and dot1ad any

2019-12-17 Thread John Lo (loj) via Lists.Fd.Io
Hi Raj, A sub-interface with "dot1q inner any" can only work with L2 forwarding via cross-connect or bridging where packets are forwarded using MAC header without any changes to MAC header nor VLAN IDs in VLAN tags. For L3 IP forwarding, any VLAN tags on a packet must be exact match to a

[vpp-dev] Coverity run FAILED as of 2019-12-17 14:04:31 UTC

2019-12-17 Thread Noreply Jenkins
Coverity run failed today. Current number of outstanding issues are 2 Newly detected: 0 Eliminated: 0 More details can be found at https://scan.coverity.com/projects/fd-io-vpp/view_defects -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#14913):

[vpp-dev] QinQ and dot1ad any

2019-12-17 Thread Raj
Hello all, When an interface is created using a command like: create sub-interfaces GigabitEthernet3/0/3 50 dot1ad 50 inner-dot1q any exact-match I can see that dual tagged packets with outer vlan 50 will be accepted by that interface. But how does a packet goes out from this interface? Is

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP VSZ shoots to 200GB because of DPDK plugin

2019-12-17 Thread Benoit Ganne (bganne) via Lists.Fd.Io
Hi Siddarth, > The issue here is that huge core files are generated, which take up a lot > of space and the system down time is huge too. > Even if I compress it, I will have to de-compress wherever I try to debug > it and the disk space requirement will be huge. I know this will not fix your

Re: [vpp-dev] Change in vpp[master]: ebuild: Cross compilation aarch64 Ubuntu support

2019-12-17 Thread Juraj Linkeš
I tried a more basic thing in my previous patch: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/21035 The patch has one file with all cross-compile arguments/parameters: build-data/platforms/aarch64-generic.mk. It also modifies the ebuild system to propagate those into both VPP and external (dpdk, rdma and

Re: [vpp-dev] Doubts about NAT #nat44 #nat

2019-12-17 Thread baixiaopeng
Hi, Thank you for your help! I'm using the latest release for my testing. 1)The output of `show version` command as follow: vpp# show version vpp v20.01-rc0~694-g11e9e35 built by root on kean at Fri Nov 22 16:12:07 HKT 2019 2)The configurations of NAT testing as follows: ip netns add ns1 ip link

Re: [vpp-dev] Doubts about NAT #nat44 #nat

2019-12-17 Thread Filip Varga via Lists.Fd.Io
Hi, Could you please send me output of `show version` command and your NAT configuration. There is a use case when this behavior is expected. Best regards, Filip [https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/signaturetool/images/logo/Cisco_Logo_no_TM_Cisco_Blue-RGB_43px.png] Filip Varga Engineer -