Re: [vpp-dev] ARP resolution from non-connected IP

2020-08-20 Thread Satya Murthy
Neale /Ben, We already have a static route to reach the peer. Even after that, we are getting this error. And this error is as per the VPP's ARP code. It's not allowing the ARP-REQUEST from a non-connected source IP. If we dont know allow this, I am not 100% sure how multihop-BGP peering kind o

Re: [vpp-dev] Jenkins Emergency Maintenance

2020-08-20 Thread Vanessa Valderrama
Maintenance is complete. Thank you, Vanessa On 8/20/20 10:53 AM, Vanessa Valderrama wrote: > > Jenkins has been placed in shut down mode to prepare for emergency > maintenance. > > *What* > > Jenkins upgrade to version 2.235.5 > > *Why* > > Jenkins upgrade due to vulnerability > > https://www.je

[vpp-dev] Jenkins Emergency Maintenance

2020-08-20 Thread Vanessa Valderrama
Jenkins has been placed in shut down mode to prepare for emergency maintenance. *What* Jenkins upgrade to version 2.235.5 *Why* Jenkins upgrade due to vulnerability https://www.jenkins.io/security/advisory/2020-08-17/ *When* 2020-08-20 1700 UTC *Impact* Jenkins will be unavailable during t

[vpp-dev] VPP 19.08.3 on Tuesday 25th August

2020-08-20 Thread Andrew Yourtchenko
Hi all, As we are nearing the start of the LTS 20.09 release cycle, myself and Dave Wallace have been preparing the stable/1908 for another point release. There are now 292 fixes cherry-picked since 19.08.2, so this is a good moment for 19.08.3. The majority of the fixes are the automatic cherr

Re: [vpp-dev] Regarding subinterface scale limit in vpp[v19.08]

2020-08-20 Thread Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io
Good catch Neale, looking again it looks like the stat segment... Then check usage with "show memory stats-segment" and increase it with "statseg { size 1024M }"... ben > -Original Message- > From: Neale Ranns (nranns) > Sent: jeudi 20 août 2020 10:32 > To: Benoit Ganne (bganne) > Subj

Re: [vpp-dev] ARP resolution from non-connected IP

2020-08-20 Thread Neale Ranns via lists.fd.io
That would probably cause the check to pass, but that route will cause VPP to ARP for the loopback address out of so the peer would also need to enable proxy ARP. However, If a-priori knowledge of what is connecting to what is allowed in the workaround, then add a static ARP entry on the peer.

Re: [vpp-dev] Regarding subinterface scale limit in vpp[v19.08]

2020-08-20 Thread Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io
You're exhausting the available heap (look for os_out_of_memory_on_failure=1 in your backtrace). You can check your memory consumption with "show memory main-heap". You can increase VPP heapsize adding eg. "heapsize 2G" [1] to your startup.conf. Best ben [1] https://fd.io/docs/vpp/master/getti

[vpp-dev] Regarding subinterface scale limit in vpp[v19.08]

2020-08-20 Thread Intelligent Learning [ Proverb 18:15]
Hi All, Created subinterface using 3 commands 1. create sub-interfaces 2. set interface state 3. set interface l2 bridge Kindly help us know if we have limitation in configuring sub interfaces Please find our configurations We wanted to achieved 4094 vlans on 24 interfaces) 24 * 4094 = 9825

Re: [vpp-dev] ARP resolution from non-connected IP

2020-08-20 Thread Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io
Maybe a workaround would be to add the host prefix of the router loopback in the fib? Eg. 'ip route add /32 '? Best ben > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Neale Ranns > via lists.fd.io > Sent: jeudi 20 août 2020 08:07 > To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; Satya Murthy >