[vpp-dev] using vpp node

Hello friends, I have created a new node and am sending packets by the trex traffic generator to process packets to my node. When the packages I send are finished, I want to complete the task (for ex. print packet count one time) and leave the vpp ( When the packages I send are finished, vpp con

Re: [vpp-dev] ip full reassembly - is_custom_app field broken ?

Hi, I don’t. I can eventually write one of course. Or maybe you’d like to give it a try? It should be almost 1:1 to ip4 change … Thanks, Klement > On 9 Nov 2020, at 11:18, Satya Murthy wrote: > > Hi Klement, > > Do you have the similar changes for ip6_full_reassembly.c as well. > If so, Ca

Re: [vpp-dev] Facing issue in IPSEC data traffic after SA is setup successfully

Hi Neale, I had not added a proper reverse route (from VPP to SS). After adding the route, traffic started working fine. Also, the crash was not seen any more after testing multiple times with reset SA and sending data traffic. On Mon, Nov 9, 2020 at 3:49 PM Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote: > > >

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP load estimation

Hi Joe, > I wonder if we can use the average VPP vector rate (size) per node to > estimate the load of a VPP instance. > More specifically, if this information can be used to determine whether > the VPP instance is overloaded (e.g., > the default max value of 255). Yes, it is the main way to quic

Re: [vpp-dev] Facing issue in IPSEC data traffic after SA is setup successfully

Hi Vijay, From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Date: Thursday, 5 November 2020 at 16:54 To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: [vpp-dev] Facing issue in IPSEC data traffic after SA is setup successfully Hi, I have set up IPSEC SA successfully b/w the Strongswan (initiator) and the VPP IPSec (responder). Aft

Re: [vpp-dev] ip full reassembly - is_custom_app field broken ?

Hi Klement, Do you have the similar changes for ip6_full_reassembly.c as well. If so, Can you pls pass on the diffs. -- Thanks & Regards, Murthy -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#17967): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/17967 Mut

Re: [vpp-dev] 2 MB of message over memif channel

Thanks Damjan / MJ for the quick inputs. -- Thanks & Regards, Murthy -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#17966): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/17966 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/78074016/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow..

[vpp-dev] VPP load estimation

Hello everyone, I am pretty new to VPP. I know that the CPU utilisation of a VPP instance is always high due to the PMD. I wonder if we can use the average VPP vector rate (size) per node to estimate the load of a VPP instance. More specifically, if this information can be used to determine whet